Search TMT
TMT Founders
Weekly Columns
Contact TMT
  • Questions? Comments? Scoops?
  • Name *
  • Your Email *
  • Subject *
  • Message *

Entries by Phil Gee (105)

Thursday
Jul222010

Marveling At The Past - Ghost Rider (2007)

"I sold my soul to the Devil and now I have to spare you."

"Spare me from what?"

"The Devil, on account that I work for him. That's why I couldn't make it to dinner."

'Ghost Rider' is the kind of comic book movie I thought we left behind us in the 90's. It contains clichés that are literally a decade old. It has no plot. Its token female character is so underdeveloped and uninteresting that it sets the movement for strong women in this genre back about five steps. It does not even attempt to be about anything. You sit there bored out of your flaming skull for two hours and feel robbed of your money. Of the unholy trilogy of Marvel movies released in 2007 (including 'Spider-man 3' & 'Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer'), 'Ghost Rider' was certainly the worst.

While I was doing a little research for this piece (stop laughing) I found an interview with the film's director Mark Steven Johnson back from 2005 at AICN right here. In this piece Johnson revealed that he wanted to make a movie about Ghost Rider even before choosing to direct 'Daredevil'. Just that statement alone has my head spinning. As I mentioned when we discussed 'Daredevil', for all its flaws, it is a film made with love that genuinely understands its main character, as well as the tone and mood of the piece. If 'Ghost Rider' is Johnson's passion project then why does it end up as the far weaker film of the two? Does it prove that Johnson only knew how to write and direct one comic book movie decently? Does it prove that the source material is not strong enough in this case to carry the weight of its director's weakness for making films?

Ghost Rider is certainly not one of Marvel's richest comic book sagas but it does offer great potential for a fantasy horror film which delves into the occult, macabre, satanic and ethereal in ways none of their other titles can. Even better for Johnson, there is no expectation or demand from an audience for a horror film to be densely layered and psychologically stimulating. All you need do is chill them, freak them out and take them on a wild ride. 'Ghost Rider' as a film is incapable of this. Most of its settings are mundane. Its villains are pathetic. Its tortured soul of a main character is played almost completely for laughs.

When we see Johnny Blaze become the Ghost Rider, when we see this regular guy that we have come to like be transformed into a flaming skull head, it should thoroughly creep us out. In that moment, we should know that Blaze really is dammed for the deal he made with the Devil and there is no way he can have a normal life. Johnson's aim seems to be to simply convey how cool it must be to have this power.

Coolness is the one thing, besides Nicholas Cage's earnest performance, that you can recommend about the film. The realisation of the Ghost Rider character visually is a real treat. It is one of those instances where the character as presented in the source material has been able to be translated to the screen without any concession or sacrifice. Ghost Rider leaps out of the page. He looks fantastic in his spiked leather jacket. The shots of him cruising down streets, up (and off of) buildings and racing against previous horseback riding Ghost Riders in the desert are beautifully realised.

But this is all we are talking about; shots, not actual action sequences. In each and every one of these, Johnson finds a way to destroy any sense of tension, momentum or adrenaline. The prime example of him setting up something potentially awesome and then letting the air out of the balloon comes during the third act. Sam Elliot's mentor character Carter Slade reveals to Blaze that he is the previous Ghost Rider from a generation ago who stole the contract for a thousand souls that the villains have been searching for. The villains have kidnapped the love interest and rather than sending Blaze off into battle alone, Elliot's character transforms one final time into his Rider persona. Our heroes speed across the desert towards the final set piece. They stop on the outskirts. We can't wait to see these two Riders fight demons side by side with shotguns and flaming chains. Then Sam Elliot turns back to normal and wishes our hero good luck. For some reason he only had the strength to transform for that one special effects shot and now he's done. So he just rides off for no credible reason and we are left utterly flabbergasted.

Before that, we have to endure the agony of Ghost Rider being chased by the police. In fact, Johnson leaves no box un-ticked for antagonist cop clichés in comic book movies. The police captain is a grouchy ass. The hero is arrested for crimes committed by the villains. The good cop and bad cop grill the cool headed hero in an interrogation room. The hero is forced to fight criminals in the lock up for no reason save that they can smell innocent people and that seems to immediately send them into a rabid rage. The hero escapes the jail and the cops engage in a high street pursuit. The hero is cornered outside some random building where the cops all line up horizontally to partake in the Johnny Blaze shooting gallery (with the love interest character thrown in as well to really ramp up the forced tragedy). And after that, we get on with the third act and the cops are never seen again.

As we've discussed over the last few weeks, the Marvel movies have contained their fair share of poor villains ranging from the mundaneness of Doctor Doom to the atrocity of Dracula and his crew of idiotic vampires in 'Blade: Trinity'. But the villains of 'Ghost Rider' take the prize. Wes Bentley's performance as Blackheart is unbelievably bad. His character is the typical spoiled brat offspring desperate to usurp his daddy for no particular reason save he was born bad. His crew of walking special effects/henchmen, as has been commented by everyone else, are the most pathetic, easily defeated villains ever seen in a comic book movie. It only stands out so much in the film because of the way said villains just seem to wander around the film aimlessly looking for the plot and then stand around as Ghost Rider picks them off one by one. The audience is not even given the proper information as to what kind of demons these creatures are, how or even if they can be killed. It just happens.

Our only hope of a credible threat lies with Satan himself (or Mephistopheles to give him his moniker in the film); the one who sets the plot into motion, tortures our hero and will unleash hell on Earth if given half a chance. Unfortunately, the character is played by Peter Fonda so that does not happen. It isn't just the miscasting but they way the entire story seems to completely undermine the character. We are told at the beginning of the film that the fabled 'contract of San Venganza', the contract for a thousand corrupt souls, will be enough for him to conquer Earth. You would think being the lord of the underworld that you would have plenty souls and plenty of time to build an army, both before the 100 years past prologue of the film and after it. I also do not understand how, with all his power, that Mephisto is unable to stop Carter Slade from running away with said contract, nor how Johnny Blaze is free to turn his own back on the demon at the end of the film. Blackheart spends the entire movie on a crusade to bring his father's rule to an end with Mephisto's only defense being to rely on some wacky human who owes him a favour. Everyone in the film walks all over Satan and, because of some self-imposed nonsense about him not being able to take action on the mortal plain save for when the plot needs him to, he lets it happen.

Another blunder is the way the deal for Blaze's soul is struck with Mephisto, with the latter agreeing to cure Johnny's father's cancer. Right after the deal, Johnny watches as Barton Blaze is killed in a stunt motorbike jump. Rather than the audience being given the opportunity to pose the question to themselves whether Barton's death was a result of cruel irony or darker forces, the film cuts to Mephisto's evil cackling as Johnny cradles his dead father. By ramming this down our throat, there is no chance for the film to play with the possibility of Blaze faithfully serving the forces of evil out of obligation and ignorance.

The film does present the neat idea when we are introduced to the older Blaze of a man with nothing to live for yet one adored by millions for his crazy bike stunts. We are shown the dichotomy of Blaze only being able to perform these stunts and survive because Mephisto is keeping him alive and yet wanting nothing more than to die, seemingly. Blaze cannot be sure that it is the Devil watching out for him and almost begins to repress the memory of the deal he made, wondering if it is time to move on and start living. When his lost love Roxanne comes back into his life, he takes it as the sign. If the film is about anything it is the story of a man who tries to start living his life and just when things start to come together, his soul is reclaimed by darkness. It would make for quite the Greek tragedy if it weren't played completely for laughs and Nicholas Cage and Eva Mendes had the slightest bit of chemistry together.

Then again, Johnson already tried to give us a greek tragedy in 'Daredevil' and, in the opinion of some people, was only able to deliver the latter part of that phrase. If 'Ghost Rider' shows me anything, it is the vision of a director who only had one comic book movie in him. If this is the film he really wanted to make first time out then it seems we were slightly deprived of a better film. Johnson was at the very least able to demonstrate passion and energy to 'Daredevil' and it seems that film sucked those talents away with it. 'Ghost Rider' is limp, lifeless and in desperate need of a soul itself.

Friday
Jul162010

Marveling At The Past - X-Men: The Last Stand (2006)

"Oh my stars and garters!"

I must start this week's piece with a little bit of an apology as you may feel 'marveling at the past' has been losing its focus over the last few weeks. The whole point of the series has been to consider the alternate routes the Marvel movies could have taken and dream of better things. What I have realised is that the film, as we got it, has to inspire me to conjure those things. If you give me 'Elektra', I cannot give you anything back. I certainly cannot imagine a better film. I can only will it into non-existence.

But if you give me 'X-Men: The Last Stand', I can get inspired. I can conjure not just one film but the entire remaining series that should have rolled out of 20th Century Fox at three yearly intervals following on from the strong foundation laid by Bryan Singer.

It has been said before but bears repeating that I cannot comprehend how Fox let such a strong franchise as the X-Men series go down the drain. I'm not talking about handing the keys to Brett Ratner. I'm talking about purposely making X-Men 3 as 'the last stand' and killing or curing not just beloved mutant characters but the ones we expected to play the biggest parts in what we thought was to come.

So the Phoenix Saga, one of Marvel Comics greatest storylines, is told without Cyclops. An epic and tragic story full of pathos, high emotion and sacrifice is squeezed into a 90 minute runtime. To add insult to injury, the Phoenix Saga is not even the main storyline but acts as a 'B' plot companion piece to the main 'mutant cure' story. Professor Xavier is atomised half way through the film. Characters like Angel are introduced in the opening, seemingly indicating that they will have some major bearing on the plot, only to on screen for about ten minutes. Fan favourite characters like Juggernaut and Psylocke are reduced to wallpaper. Rogue and Mystique, the two strongest female characters, are relieved of their mutant powers and booted out of the series. Wolverine becomes the team leader going completely against the lone warrior persona that defines him (and even delivering a motivational speech just to really rub it in). And Halle Berry is finally allowed to hijack the series for her own selfish needs.

Yet 'X-Men: The Last Stand' contains a fair few brilliant moments. If the film has one overiding flaw its that it is nothing more than a smorgasboard of scenes which are strung together without any theme or strong plotting holding them together. Beast visits Leech (the cure child) for no apparent reason. Cyclops travels back to Alkali Lake for a bit of an angry yell (which he could have done in his bedroom) and Jean shows up on shore at the exact same time. Jean lies unconciouss solely so Logan and Storm can find and bring her back to the mansion. Magneto is able to pinpoint the exact location of a prison convoy. Day turns to pitch black evening in the space of one shot. The list goes on and on.

What the third film needed was breathing room to tell its story properly. The fans wanted the Phoenix Saga. The studio wanted an 'X-Men vs. Magneto' movie. There is plenty of room for compromise but not in a 90 minute film. They should have shot X3 and X4 back to back and told the Phoenix Saga over the course of those two films, still allowing space for the epic action movie the studio wanted. That is what we are going to pitch tonight. All I need you to do is close your eyes, go back in time to the year 2003 when you were still buzzing with excitement over the logical next installments of the X-Men motion picture saga and how glorious it was going to be. Now imagine it is three years later and it actually happened.

X3 needed, more than anything, a unifying theme to tie it all together. Our version of X3 would be a far more intimate and personal story than the first two films, which played to the larger themes of tolerance and persecution. Relying deeply on the relationships and dynamics between the characters we have now grown to love, X3 would have been about the surrogate parents of lost, lonely and frightened children, the responsibilities that come with their upbringing, and the consequences of the paths they are sent on.

This would reverberate through many of the major relationships in the film; Xavier, Magneto and Jean, Xavier and Cyclops, Xavier and Emma Frost, Frost and Jean, Frost and Sebastian Shaw, Storm and Cyclops, Magneto and Pyro, Nightcrawler and Mystique, and Mystique and Rogue.

The finished film gets off to a fantastic start by showing us the first meeting between Xavier, Magneto and Jean Grey as a little girl, seemingly setting the stage for the Phoenix Saga to come and assuring us that the film's focus will be firmly on her character. Alas, not only does this turn out not to be the case but the scene itself goes nowhere. Showing Jean lifting a block cars with her telekinesis is not enough to visually convince the audience that she possesses planet destroying powers beyond her control and that she must be protected from herself before she does any lasting damage. We need Xavier to tell us this later on the film. It would have made much more sense for the scene to end in tragedy. With just the smallest emotional outburst or loss of temper, Jean either atomises her parents or destroys her entire neighbourhood.

Either way, this event marks a turning point in the friendship and partnership between Xavier and Magneto. Xavier makes the choice there and then to protect Jean as best he can by taking her under his wing and blocking the terrible memory of what she has done from her. Magneto sees for the first time in this little girl the potential destructive power of homosuperior and how the mere threat of its use could save them from persecution from humanity. Why even waste time being hiding from humanity or being diplomatic when you have that power? For those not familiar with the story as established in the first two films, this gets them up to speed on these two ideologies which will continue to build and finally come to a head at the climax of X4.

For the record, both the character of Angel and the mutant cure storyline would both be exorcised from our revised outline. They are both wonderful ideas with a lot of potential on film (some of which was seen in the finished product), but not this one. I never saw any synergy between the Phoenix and mutant cure storylines. They just don't gel for me.

This still leaves the issue of how humanity deals with the mutant problem in the film. The thrilling cliffhanger of X2 for me was not the reveal of the Phoenix but the image of the President of the United States about to deliver a key speech to the nation, written presumably with the intent of passing the Mutant Registration Act, but after an intimidating visit by the X-Men unsure what he was actually going to say. It was interesting in 'X-Men: The Last Stand' to see Beast brought in as secretary for mutant affairs but really disappointing to see the president being played by a completely different actor (and a bad one at that) who appears to have no issues with homosuperiors save for terrorists like Magneto.

In our X3 we would learn that the most unsettling kind of reaction is that of silence. The registration act is not passed. In fact no comments are publicly made by the president about the mutant issue, preferring to use Beast as a puppet to deliver false hope. In reality, the government is in collusion with Sebastian Shaw, closet mutant and powerful businessman who instigates the creation of a mutant penal island called Genosha and a certain army of robotic sentries who will be responsible for getting the world's mutants to go there. I have always loved the concept of Genosha. You often hear intolerant retards in the real world explaining that the best way to eliminate problems with minorities is to just deport and dump them on their own isolated patch of land, completely cut off from normal people. Genosha on screen could be a wonderfully satirical response to that line of thinking. I suppose the film 'District 9' has explored that concept now. Then again, 'District 9' didn't have Sentinels (more on them later).

Shaw also has his sights set on Jean Grey and the X-Men. The Hellfire Club, the secret society of elite mutants of which Shaw is the head, have located Jean and intend to manipulate her for their own ends. Key to making this work is Hellfire member Emma Frost whom, we learn, was one of Xavier's first students along like Jean. She also possessed amazing powers far beyond her years. Unlike Jean, she got wise to the professor's keen talent for control and manipulation and grew resentful. Now as she manipulates Jean to unleash the Phoenix, we cannot be sure exactly what angle she is coming from. Is she trying to break down the mental blocks that Xavier has imprinted in Jean's mind in order to free her, or so she can see the professor for what he is and enact a terrible revenge?

Throughout the film, a key relationship would be that between Cyclops and Storm. There would be a definite need to repair the damage that has been done by the underdevelopment of these important characters. Both of them are the leaders of the X-Men but neither have been presented strongly as such in the films. Cyclops is a pussy whipped moping bitch and Storm is Halle Berry and nobody wants her in the movies. As X3 opens, Cyclops is a broken man and the film takes him on a journey of personal growth. Storm takes it upon herself to act, not only as the leader of the team during this period, but to pull Cyclops back from the brink and instill those leadership qualities in him. By the end of the film, due largely to a tragedy in the team, Cyclops will be the leader we know and love from the comics and Storm will have been given a clear function to perform.

A good portion of the film would take place, just as in the comics, at the New York headquarters of the Hellfire Club as the X-Men confront both evil mutants more powerful than anything they have faced before but also reunite with a Jean Grey who has transformed into something they barely recognise. By the third act, the Hellfire Club have been defeated but Shaw has escaped to Genosha to continue his plans there and Jean has slipped away having, as Xavier has surmised, returned home.

All the while, Magneto's apparent lack of activity has been unsettling Xavier. Rather than another plot for mutant domination with a technical doohickey, the Brotherhood (in particular Pyro) have been trying to seduce and recruit Xavier's students to join Magneto's cause, just as Pyro himself was roped in. Catching them at their teenage years when they are most emotionally vulnerable, the Brotherhood are actually able to recruit some followers and the younger generation of X-Men take it upon themselves to split up from the rest of the team and do something about it.

Iceman, Rogue, Colossus and Nightcrawler confront the Brotherhood at Magneto's base of operations; not a row of tents like in the finished film but his isolated island lair from the first movie (which as far as I was concerned was still floating out there completely untouched). Doing this is really just an excuse to accomplish three distinct goals. Firstly, the little kid in me always wanted to see the X-Men fly off to confront Magneto at his island lair. That's something which takes me right back to the nostalgia of the arcade beat em' up game. Just like in the game, our heroes find that Magneto isn't even home but have their hands full enough with Mystique, Juggernaut and Pyro.

Secondly, reuniting Rogue and Nightcrawler with Mystique provides the opportunity for the latter to reveal what the fans have been waiting for her to say since the subtle groundwork laid in X2; that she is the genuine mother of Nightcrawler and surrogate mother to Rogue, having abandoned both of them and setting all three on their paths. Maybe it is a little too much (and a little too neat) to have Mystique be mother to both characters in the films but it would work because it ties in to the theme of the piece. While most abandoned mutant children are forsaken by homosapiens, Mystique is proof positive that mutant parents can be just as cruel. The main reason to bring that element in though would be to give Rebecca Romijn something more substantial to play in the part she truly owns.

Thirdly and most importantly, this set piece would provide our introduction to the mutant hunting robot Sentinels. Given that every X-Men fan worth their salt has been waiting for their arrival (and in the real world, still are), this sequence would be milked for all its worth, played out with the suspense and grandeur of the reveal of the creature in a monster movie. As the X-Men confront the Brotherhood, they are surrounded by ominous mechanical sounds bearing down on the walls just outside, right before those walls are ripped apart by gigantic robotic arms providing our first glimpse. The second comes as the mutants desperately scramble to escape, stopping only for the distracting and vague sight of what they can only describe as 'tin men' viewed in the distance through the walls that have already been ripped out. Finally, as Magneto's lair completely collapses around them, the mutants are trapped on what remains of a barren lump of rock, surrounded by the ultimate physical representation of humanity's hatred of mutants; the awe inspiring image of six or seven Sentinels bearing down on them. The very concept of how far humanity has gone to exterminate them brings the entire group of mutants to paralysis, though they find themselves united together by that very fear. As each one of our characters is taken prisoner by the Sentinels, Mystique can only think of the master of magnetism and how much they need him right now.

But Magneto has far more pressing matters to attend to, namely recruiting the Phoenix and her incredible powers for the Brotherhood. I think even people who didn't enjoy the finished film would agree that the sequence where Xavier and Magneto reunite with Jean at the house where they first met her two decades earlier is a very effective one. In fact it works so well that the film never again seems to be able to match it, which brings me to feel that the scene, albeit in a reworked fashion, would make the perfect climax for X3. It only makes sense dramatically that the ending of the film provides some symmetry with its beginning.

This symmetry between the first and last scene is an element that was present in both of Singer's films which also exposes the theme of each. X1 begins and ends with Xavier and Magneto, the ultimate clash of unshakable, opposing ideologies and the first film is very much about that conflict. X2 begins and ends in the oval office, the ultimate symbol of human authority now heavily involved in the shaping of mutant affairs, and the film is very much about the human/mutant conflict. In our X3, both at the start and end of the film, Xavier and Magneto confront a scared and lost child with powers far beyond her control and attempt to, in blunt terms, manipulate her. Just as it did when they first met her, the Phoenix is unleashed.

There are two problems I did have with the sequence as presented in the finished product. The first being that when the X-Men face off against the Brotherhood outside Jean's house, the neighbourhood looks exactly the same as it did in the opening scene. The idea of super powered mutants fighting each other in a cozy suburban hamlet in broad daylight with all of Jean's neighbours watching through the windows doesn't exactly sit well with me. You've probably noticed in the film that the place is completely deserted which makes it all the more weird. By the time Jean's house actually flies off into the air I think someone would have called the cops. If our X3 established Jean's original home as a place of tragedy then it would only make sense for her neighbourhood to be condemmed and shut off from the rest of the world; a physical memory of Jean's past mutated into the dark and desolate place her soul has become. Such a move satisfies the logic of the plot and makes for a pretty cool stage to play the finale out on.

The second issue of course is the premature death of Xavier. I have no issue with the idea of Jean killing one of the X-Men. Such an event is the perfect clincher for our heroes to realise that the woman they knew and love has transformed into something else and may be lost forever. The filmmakers just picked the wrong team member to kill. If they wanted to shock the audience as well as get them on their feet cheering, they should have killed Storm. As mentioned earlier, our version of X3 would do its best to repair the damage done by both the miscasting of Halle Berry and the undervelopment of the character. Once she is killed, Cyclops finally snaps out his self induced apathy, utilises the skills he has learned from Storm and takes charge of the X-Men, emerging as the leader comic fans have always known him to be. He also finally accepts the harsh truth that Jean may be beyond saving.

But there is one more harsh truth to come. After witnessing Jean's power first hand, the X-Men are still befuddled as to where exactly it has come from. Xavier is forced to confess that he is partially responsible. The filmmakers (whether Singer, Ratner or otherwise) were in a better position than some comic book adaptations when coming to tackle the Phoenix Saga. Having accepted the more grounded tone established by the first film, the audience was well aware that a literal translation involving the intergalactic Shi'ar Empire and the Phoenix being an alien lifeform that possesses Jean was unlikely to be on the cards. We were willing and ready to accept a more realistic adaptation and, shock of shocks, 'X-Men: The Last Stand' actually gave us one which worked.

I loved the concept of the Phoenix being a repressed part of Jean's physce and how she possessed so much devestating power at an early age that Xavier felt he had no choice but to contain it in any way he could. At the end of our version of the film, Xavier confesses this to the assembled team members that have not been killed or captured by this point, leaving the explanation of the Phoenix a mystery to keep us engaged for as long as possible. It is Cyclops, the one who would have given his life for Xavier at any time, who feels most betrayed and though he is ready to step up and lead the team, he turns his back on his surrogate father, feeling that everything which has come to pass is as a result of the professor making Jean's choices for her.

So our version of X3 ends on a total downer with the entire planet practically on the brink of destruction. The Sentinels are now actively targeting mutants all over the globe. Magneto, always a dangerous fanatic, now has Jean and the power of the Phoenix at his side. Half of the X-Men are missing in action. The other half have rejected their guiding light in Xavier and are heading into a mission they know they have little to no chance of accomplishing. The most competent member of the team has been killed by one of their own. Cyclops is tasked with killing the woman he loves. And in the final shot of the film, we see the birthplace of the Sentinels themselves and realise that there are more than a few to contend with. The super Sentinel aka Master Mold is now churning them out at such a rate that there will soon be more mutant hunters than mutants in the world.

Keeping with the symmetry between first and last scene, X4 opens in the Danger Room with the X-Men fighting for their lives in a simulation not too dissimilar from the epic final battle coming up. Most of the film would centre around Genosha where the mutants captured at Magneto's lair have been taken and where the Sentinels are launching from. It is actually the perfect excuse to bring in new mutant characters by introducing them as having already been imprisoned there. You wouldn't want to overload the piece with substantial new supporting players but simply provide cameos and easter eggs that the fans can respond to. Specifically though, Genosha is where we would meet Gambit. Through their experiences together, the romantic relationship we know between Rogue and Gambit would begin to take shape.

Meanwhile, having finally seen his worst nightmares come to fruition, Magneto unleashes both his and Jean's full powers against the world's military might as he demands to know the location of Genosha in order to erase it from the globe. Wiping out convoys, ripping out landmark bridges, destroying submarines and stealing their nuclear payloads and holding entire cities hostage; you name it, Magneto does it. At the same time, the X-Men are trying to find Genosha "the traditional way - look", leading to an epic climax on the island itself with the fate of both human and mutant kind in the balance.

The 'last stand', if you will, offers the opportunity to show each X-man pitted mano-a-mano against the Brotherhood member we want to see them fight. Not only would we see Iceman vs. Pyro, but Colossus vs. Juggernaut and Rogue vs. Mystique. Not to mention Wolverine, Gambit and Nightcrawler taking down Sentinels single handedly. Most importantly, the film could deliver the final, physical, confrontation we have been waiting for between Xavier and Magneto. For all his monstrous powers to tear armies and cities apart with a flick of the wrist, Magneto has no defense against the mental powers of his old friend. While their children play out the war they started with brute force, Xavier and Magneto engage in a battle of willpower with the professor finally unleashing powers of manipulation that he dared never to use before. Rather than blocking memories like he did with Jean, Xavier brings Magneto right back to his tragic upbringing and makes him relive it right then and there. Just as Eric Lensherr is brought to paralysis by the horrors he endured all those years ago, just as his head is filled to the brim with reflection on a life which has brought him nothing but violence and pain, Xavier empties it completely. Xavier mindwipes Magneto leaving him as nothing but an empty shell. The Brotherhood is finally defeated.

The battle has left the X-Men barely alive themselves and certainly in no condition to finish off the Sentinel army or destroy Master Mold. Just like in the finished film, Jean is the last standing member of Magneto's crew and is the only one with the power to destroy the Sentinels. The only hope of that happening is for Cyclops to be able to reach the real Jean hidden inside the Phoenix and reason with her to fight back. Wolverine quite rightly reminds Cyke that Jean will atomize anyone who gets close enough to her without a second's thought. After an almost wordless exchange, the two rivals resign themselves to what must be done. With his invincible adamantium body, Wolverine is the only one who can withstand Jean's attacks, but Cyclops is the only one who can actually stop her. Similar to how it plays in the finished film, Wolverine charges at Jean as she uses her psychic powers to tear pounds of flesh away from his body. While lesser beings would instantly be reduced to a bloody pulp, Wolverine's healing factor kicks into overdrive and just about keeps his body together. The difference is that Cyclops is right behind him using that adamantium shield to get close to Jean.

Then, like pages ripped from the final moments of X-Men issue #137, Cyclops manages to reach the real Jean Grey. After all the X-Men have been through, they have managed to save their friend. However, Jean tells her great love in completely rational terms that there is no way to save her, that she must pay for her sins and that Xavier was right to do what he did to her mind all those years ago; that all mutants born with extraordinary powers must take on the responsibility of being able to control those talents and that she never could. As she says her final goodbyes to her friends, and as Cyclops and Wolverine watch helplessly, Jean unleashes the final, ultimate form of the Phoenix. In a sequence both beautiful and terrifying, the Phoenix completely obliterates Master Mould and the entire Sentinel army before soaring into the heavens and exploding in space. She could have lived to be a God but it was more important that she die a human.

As X4 ends, our focus as we wrap up is on the characters most directly affected by Jean's passing; Cyclops, Wolverine, Professor Xavier and Magneto. The audience expects Cyke to be even more despondent than he was at the start of the third film but, of course, he has learned so much from Jean and the rest of the team over the course of their adventure that he is now and forever will be the leader of the X-Men. When he thinks of Jean, he can only remember her courage and sacrifice and how, while being its greatest threat, she saved the entire planet. Having just known her is enough for him to keep fighting. Having been her great love and best friend constantly inspires him to be more than he ever thought he could be. In fact, X4 would be very much about finding that inner strength inside us all, the one thing that inspires and motivates us to keep fighting.

Wolverine meanwhile is on the complete opposite end of the spectrum. Having his spirit almost totally broken by both Jean's death and the realisation that she never could have been with him, he packs up and leaves the X-Mansion once again. Inspired by a rather brilliant alternate ending which was cut from 'X-Men: The Last Stand', Wolverine returns to the shady Canadian bar where we first met him and even reunites with the crotchety barkeep who pulled a shotgun on him. Saying that he is only stopping for a beer before he moves on, the comic fans are left knowing full well that Wolverine is finally on his way to Japan and into his first solo movie as a character (more on that in a few weeks time).

Finally, we see the poignant sight of the master of magnetism reduced to the appearance of a harmless old man playing chess in the park. Even though I objected to the death of Xavier in the finished film, I cannot deny the haunting power of seeing Eric Lensherr completely alone in the world as a result of the path he has chosen, gazing into the chess board and clearly wishing that he could see his friend again. I think it is a wonderful little scene. Just imagine how cool it would be if Xavier were in that scene, once again playing chess with his old friend but one that does not recognise him due to the mindwipe. Calling their current game to an end, Xavier promises Eric that they will play again tomorrow and leaves. Just as in the finished film, Eric stares back at the board, extends his finger and the chess pieces appear to move of their own accord; cut to credits.

Phew, I think we can call it a night now. I do apologize if any of that was long winded but you have to understand that tonight's article has actually been four years in the making. The whole concept of this series of articles actually started with the idea of re-conceptualising X3 as the film I was expecting it to be all those years ago and sharing that with my fellow geeks. Never forget either that, while things have turned out differently, I still hold out hope that one far off day, we will see a brand new X-Men series of films and we will see the Phoenix Saga done right. It may take a long time to arrive but it is going to happen. X-Men is not going to go away.

Sadly, neither are Ghost Rider or Spider-man and they'll be next on the agenda for 'marveling at the past' so stay tuned every Friday to TMT for the next article. Excelsior!

Thursday
Jul152010

The Alien Anthology Blu-Ray Set Is Coming To Destroy Your Social Life

It's been a badly kept secret that the 'Alien' series would be making its debut on Blu-Ray this Winter and frankly I haven't been that excited about it.  This isn't because I don't love and admire the films (save for the fourth which I despise) but I felt the Alien Quadrilogy DVD boxset from 2003 featured, pretty much, the definitive collection of supplemental materials for the series.

The only items that were not included seemed to be things we would never see.  The infamous deleted scene from James Cameron's 'Aliens' where Ripley encounters the cocooned Carter Burke (Paul Reiser) was left off the set at the director's request, supposedly because he is quite embarrassed by it.  And the idea of David Fincher being directly involved with any sort of retrospective on 'Alien 3' be it interview, commentary or full on director's cut was just too much to hope for.

Well IGN has the scoop on the full specs for the upcoming Anthology set as well as a look at the spanky limited edition packaging right here.  The six disc set will offer two cuts of each film, new commentary tracks from Sigourney Weaver, isolated score tracks and new featurettes.  But they have also confirmed that we WILL see the 'Burke cocooned' sequence and although Fincher, to the best of our knowledge, continues to not be directly involved with the third film, the set will include the full, uncut version of the retrospective documentary 'wreckage and rape: the making of Alien 3'.  A large amount of material was cut from this documentary before its inclusion on the 2003 Quadrilogy set for reasons which will only really become clear once we see it.  It goes without saying that we can expect a lot more footage of Fincher losing his shit with Fox executives visiting the set and, hopefully, full disclosure about this legendary nightmare production.

The bottom line is, I'm sold.  Here is a full list of the specs:

Disc One: Alien

  • 1979 Theatrical Version
  • 2003 Director's Cut with Ridley Scott Introduction
  • Audio Commentary by Director Ridley Scott, Writer Dan O'Bannon, Executive Producer Ronald Shusett, Editor Terry Rawlings, Actors Sigourney Weaver, Tom Skerritt, Veronica Cartwright, Harry Dean Stanton and John Hurt
  • Audio Commentary (for Theatrical Cut only) by Ridley Scott
  • Final Theatrical Isolated Score by Jerry Goldsmith
  • Composer's Original Isolated Score by Jerry Goldsmith
  • Deleted and Extended Scenes
  • MU-TH-UR Mode Interactive Experience with Weyland-Yutani Datastream


Disc Two: Aliens

  • 1986 Theatrical Version
  • 1991 Special Edition with James Cameron Introduction
  • Audio Commentary by Director James Cameron, Producer Gale Anne Hurd, Alien Effects Creator Stan Winston, Visual Effects Supervisors Robert Skotak and Dennis Skotak, Miniature Effects Supervisor Pat McClung, Actors Michael Biehn, Bill Paxton, Lance Henriksen, Jenette Goldstein, Carrie Henn and Christopher Henn
  • Final Theatrical Isolated Score by James Horner
  • Composer's Original Isolated Score by James Horner
  • Deleted and Extended Scenes
  • MU-TH-UR Mode Interactive Experience with Weyland-Yutani Datastream


Disc Three: Alien 3

  • 1992 Theatrical Version
  • 2003 Special Edition (Restored Workprint Version)
  • Audio Commentary by Cinematographer Alex Thomson, B.S.C., Editor Terry Rawlings, Alien Effects Designers Alec Gillis and Tom Woodruff, Jr., Visual Effects Producer Richard Edlund, A.S.C., Actors Paul McGann and Lance Henriksen
  • Final Theatrical Isolated Score by Elliot Goldenthal
  • Deleted and Extended Scenes
  • MU-TH-UR Mode Interactive Experience with Weyland-Yutani Datastream


Disc Four: Alien Resurrection

  • 1997 Theatrical Version
  • 2003 Special Edition with Jean-Pierre Jeunet Introduction
  • Audio Commentary by Director Jean-Pierre Jeunet, Editor Hervé Schneid, A.C.E., Alien Effects Creators Alec Gillis and Tom Woodruff, Jr., Visual Effects Supervisor Pitof, Conceptual Artist Sylvain Despretz, Actors Ron Perlman, Dominique Pinon and Leland Orser
  • Final Theatrical Isolated Score by John Frizzell
  • Deleted and Extended Scenes
  • MU-TH-UR Mode Interactive Experience with Weyland-Yutani Datastream


Disc Five: Making the Anthology

In addition to over 12 hours of candid, in-depth documentaries, you now have the ability to go even deeper into Alien Anthology history with nearly five hours of additional video Enhancement Pods created exclusively for this collection, presenting behind-the-scenes footage, raw dailies and interview outtakes from all four films. At topical points in the documentaries, you may access these pods to enhance your experience, or watch them on their own from the separate Enhancement Pod index.

  • The Beast Within: Making Alien
    • The Visualists: Direction and Design
    • Truckers in Space: Casting
    • Fear of the Unknown: Shepperton Studios, 1978
    • The Darkest Reaches: Nostromo and Alien Planet
    • The Eighth Passenger: Creature Design
    • Future Tense: Editing and Music
    • Outward Bound: Visual Effects
    • A Nightmare Fulfilled: Reaction to the Film
    • Enhancement Pods
  • Superior Firepower: Making Aliens
    • 57 Years Later: Continuing the Story
    • Building Better Worlds: From Concept to Construction
    • Preparing for Battle: Casting and Characterization
    • This Time It's War: Pinewood Studios, 1985
    • The Risk Always Lives: Weapons and Action
    • Bug Hunt: Creature Design
    • Beauty and the Bitch: Power Loader vs. Queen Alien
    • Two Orphans: Sigourney Weaver and Carrie Henn
    • The Final Countdown: Music, Editing and Sound
    • The Power of Real Tech: Visual Effects
    • Aliens Unleashed: Reaction to the Film
    • Enhancement Pods
  • Wreckage and Rage: Making Alien 3
    • Development Hell: Concluding the Story
    • Tales of the Wooden Planet: Vincent Ward's Vision
    • Stasis Interrupted: David Fincher's Vision
    • Xeno-Erotic: H.R. Giger's Redesign
    • The Color of Blood: Pinewood Studios, 1991
    • Adaptive Organism: Creature Design
    • The Downward Spiral: Creative Differences
    • Where the Sun Burns Cold: Fox Studios, L.A. 1992
    • Optical Fury: Visual Effects
    • Requiem for a Scream: Music, Editing and Sound
    • Post-Mortem: Reaction to the Film
    • Enhancement Pods
  • One Step Beyond: Making Alien Resurrection
    • From the Ashes: Reviving the Story
    • French Twist: Direction and Design
    • Under the Skin: Casting and Characterization
    • Death from Below: Fox Studios, Los Angeles, 1996
    • In the Zone: The Basketball Scene
    • Unnatural Mutation: Creature Design
    • Genetic Composition: Music
    • Virtual Aliens: Computer Generated Imagery
    • A Matter of Scale: Miniature Photography
    • Critical Juncture: Reaction to the Film
    • Enhancement Pods
  • MU-TH-UR Mode Interactive Experience to Access and Control Enhancement Pods


Disc Six: The Anthology Archives

Alien

  • Pre-Production
    • First Draft Screenplay by Dan O'Bannon
    • Ridleygrams: Original Thumbnails and Notes
    • Storyboard Archive
    • The Art of Alien: Conceptual Art Portfolio
    • Sigourney Weaver Screen Tests with Select Director Commentary
    • Cast Portrait Gallery
  • Production
    • The Chestbuster: Multi-Angle Sequence with Commentary
    • Video Graphics Gallery
    • Production Image Galleries
    • Continuity Polaroids
    • The Sets of Alien
    • H.R. Giger's Workshop Gallery[list]
    • Pre-Production and Aftermath[list]
    • Additional Deleted Scenes
    • Image & Poster Galleries
  • Experience in Terror
  • Special Collector's Edition LaserDisc Archive
  • The Alien Legacy
  • American Cinematheque: Ridley Scott Q&A
  • Trailers & TV Spots


Aliens

  • Pre-Production
    • Original Treatment by James Cameron
    • Pre-Visualizations: Multi-Angle Videomatics with Commentary
    • Storyboard Archive
    • The Art of Aliens: Image Galleries
    • Cast Portrait Gallery
  • Production
    • Production Image Galleries
    • Continuity Polaroids
    • Weapons and Vehicles
    • Stan Winston's Workshop
    • Colonial Marine Helmet Cameras
    • Video Graphics Gallery
    • Weyland-Yutani Inquest: Nostromo Dossiers
  • Pre-Production and Aftermath
    • Deleted Scene: Burke Cocooned
    • Deleted Scene Montage
    • Image Galleries
    • Special Collector's Edition LaserDisc Archive
    • Main Title Exploration
    • Aliens: Ride at the Speed of Fright
    • Trailers & TV Spots


Alien 3

  • Pre-Production
    • Storyboard Archive
    • The Art of Arceon
    • The Art of Fiorina
  • Production
    • Furnace Construction: Time-Lapse Sequence
    • EEV Bioscan: Multi-Angle Vignette with Commentary
    • Production Image Galleries
    • A.D.I.'s Workshop
  • Pre-Production and Aftermath
    • Visual Effects Gallery
    • Special Shoot: Promotional Photo Archive
  • Alien3 Advance Featurette
  • The Making of Alien3 Promotional Featurette
  • Trailers & TV Spots


Alien Resurrection

  • Pre-Production
    • First Draft Screenplay by Joss Whedon
    • Test Footage: A.D.I. Creature Shop with Commentary
    • Test Footage: Costumes, Hair and Makeup
    • Pre-Visualizations: Multi-Angle Rehearsals
    • Storyboard Archive
    • The Marc Caro Portfolio: Character Designs
    • The Art of Resurrection: Image Galleries
  • Production
    • Production Image Galleries
    • A.D.I.'s Workshop
  • Pre-Production and Aftermath
    • Visual Effects Gallery
    • Special Shoot: Promotional Photo Archive
  • HBO First Look: The Making of Alien Resurrection
  • Alien Resurrection Promotional Featurette
  • Trailers & TV Spots


Alien Anthology

  • Two Versions of Alien Evolution
  • The Alien Saga
  • Patches and Logos Gallery
  • Aliens 3D Attraction Scripts and Gallery
  • Aliens in the Basement: The Bob Burns Collection
  • Parodies
  • Dark Horse Cover Gallery
  • Patches and Logos Gallery
  • MU-TH-UR Mode Interactive Experience

 

The Alien Anthology will be released this October where it goes head to head with the Back To The Future boxset for your geek dollars.

Saturday
Jul102010

Dream Specs - Superman: The Motion Picture Anthology (1978-2006)

I am an optimist ladies and gentlemen. While some passionate film fans may stare at their theatrical poster of David Lynch's 'Dune' and lament the fact that a true director's cut of that film will never happen, I remain convinced that it lies just beyond the horizon and will be sprung upon us when we least expect it. 

Just last week, my good friend Jamie Williams and I were chatting about the legendary Eric Stoltz footage from 'Back To The Future' that was almost certainly just lying in some heavily secured film vault at Universal. Jamie said that there was no way we would be seeing that footage on any future release of the film. Literally a day later, producer Bob Gale told us we would.

We may have a fair few reservations in relation to double dipping, only putting special features on Blu-Ray releases of new movies, terrible looking restorations on archive films, the politics which can keep us from getting the supplemental material we really want etc. But we also have to admit that we have never had it so good. Even films which require us to cling to our big box VHS copies due to lack of a DVD release eventually get one (such as Joe Dante's 'Matine'). Classic films which make us wait an age for a proper special edition release often blow even its most ardent fans completely away with the results (such as Ridley Scott's 'Blade Runner'). And beloved film franchises like 'Back To The Future', which were somewhat lacking excellence on their initial special edition release, have the real deal waiting just around the corner.

To that end, my new series of articles 'Dream Specs' is designed to pitch exactly that; the definitive compendium of supplemental material that we would wish to see on a future Blu-Ray/DVD release of a beloved series of films filled to the brim with fascinating production histories, legendary lost footage and juicy studio/filmmaker clashes.

I certainly cannot think of a better one to tackle than the Superman motion picture series, starting from Richard Donner's 'Superman: The Movie' in 1978, three sequels, the spin-off 'Supergirl', and the agonizing journey through development hell to bring the character back for a fifth outing, culminating in Bryan Singer's requel 'Superman Returns' in 2006. Right now you are saying to me that you bought a Superman DVD boxset that same year and it was pretty stuffed with extras (including the long awaited 'Superman II: Richard Donner Cut') thank you very much. It was certainly a fantastic effort on the part of Warner Bros. but any die-hard fan of the films will tell you that there is still so much further to go.

So join me if you will as we conjure up the definitive twenty disc Superman film boxset that, if dreams come true, we would get to pluck from store shelves around Christmas 2012 to coincide with the release of the much anticipated Christopher Nolan produced reboot; 'Superman: The Motion Picture Anthology (1978-2006)':-

Disc 1 - 'Superman: The Movie' Theatrical Cut

When the beloved theatrical version of my favourite film made its DVD debut in 2006, it was actually greeted with derision by some of its die-hard fans. The reason for this being that, despite initially announcing it, the film's original sound mix was not included, only a chopped down version of the remastered soundtrack from the 2000 special edition by its producer Micheal Thau. To the less discriminating, the sound mix is suitably bold and epic. To those who grew up with the film on television and VHS, it contains badly misjudged moments, most notably during the opening credits. As each cast and crew name whooshes through the screen in a powerful blue blur, the original sound mix offers a restrained rush of air which allows John Williams theme to be heard in all its glory. The remastered mix replaces this restraint with a violent "boosh" every time a credit appears, almost drowning out the theme. 'Superman' is an important American film which deserves proper restoration and preservation. Please re-release it with its original soundtrack.

Disc 2 - 'Superman: The Movie' The Final Cut

I will admit right now that this is just anal retentiveness on my part being that it is my favourite film and I will never be completely satisfied. You know how there are fans of 'Blade Runner' who can carefully explain the pros and cons of all five released versions? Well that's me with 'Superman: The Movie'. My dream final cut of the film would extend it to its epic three hour length, as seen on television in the eighties, giving us as much of Richard Donner's world as possible. Most importantly, it would be able to restore John Williams complete score back into the film. For whatever reason, Williams wrote his score to a longer cut of the film and restoring it turns a great comic book movie into a mini operetta.

Disc 3 - 'Superman: The Movie' Supplemental Material

WB have done us fans proud with the treatment they have given to the first film. We have been given two all-encompassing documentaries (three if you count the section on 'Look Up In the Sky'), behind the scene footage and screen tests. I cannot ask for more.

Disc 4 - 'Superman II' The Richard Lester Cut

Smoke Richard Lester out of hiding, plant a big bag of money and get him to record audio commentary for the film. Better yet, have Richard Donner co-host it with him. Even people who don't listen to commentaries will crank that one up.

Disc 5 - 'Superman II' The Richard Donner Cut 

Oh boy, it wasn't exactly up to scratch was it? I'm not exactly sure how to feel about the alternate 'Superman II' that we ended up with. On the one hand, one of the great fan wet dreams of all time was finally realised. On the other hand, unless you have an actual budget at your disposal, you cannot make a complete film with unfinished footage. Donner never shot the villains conquering the world and he never figured out the ending he was going to use all the way back in 1980. Neither of those can just be conjured out of thin air. Passionate fans continue to try and finish the film to this day. The work of one particular editor by the name of Seultron (which you can check out right here) has proven to be so impressive and inspiring that even us exhausted fans have gotten excited again at the prospect of an improved, final cut of Donner's work. If you can go back and edit the film properly, create a sound mix which doesn't re-use the same cue five times in the space of thirty minutes and use organic special effects to show General Zod actually taking over the world as opposed to a dinky little middle American town then we can finally put Superman II behind us as a 'finished film'.

Disc 6 - 'Superman II' Supplemental Material

The journey of 'Superman II' to the screen is surely worthy of a two hour documentary all by itself. Shooting even higher, I would love an on-screen reunion of the actors who played the three Kryptonian criminals as well as a face to face interview between Donner and Lester........or a caged death-match. I'm flexible about it.

Disc 7 - 'Superman III' Theatrical Cut

Richard Pryor's super computer finally in the glory of Blu-Ray.

Disc 8 - 'Superman III ' Extended Cut

The most unnecessary extended cut of the series as all of the deleted material can be seen on the most recent DVD release and it adds nothing but further out of kilter comedy to the film. The extended cut is actually a 140 minute version of the film which was produced by the Salkinds for television and contains one vital ingredient missing from the theatrical version; an actual opening credits sequence set against a star field, matching the continuity of the rest of the series and actually starting out with the pretense of being a Superman movie (you can see it here). That alone makes it my preferred version of the film.

Disc 9 - 'Superman III' Supplemental Material

I want to see an in-depth featurette examining the abandoned early versions of 'Superman III' as written by Ilya Salkind and featuring Supergirl and Brainiac. I'd also love to see that legendary appearance by Richard Pryor on 'The Tonight Show' which started the ball rolling on the film we got, not to mention the downhill spiral of the series.

Disc 10 - 'Supergirl' Theatrical Cut

Anchor Bay initially produced a fantastic DVD of 'Supergirl' containing both the international version of the film and the never before seen director's cut. But during its initial release, the film was actually distributed in the US by Tristar Pictures who cut the film down to below two hours, almost rendering it incomprehensible and certainly eliminating a great deal of the title character's screentime. I don't think that particular version of the film has ever been released on DVD and, in the interest of giving the viewer an appreciation of just why it was received so badly upon release, it should be.

Disc 11 - 'Supergirl' Director's Cut

The 138 minute director's cut (get through the thing in one sitting if you dare) as released by Anchor Bay a few years ago.

Disc 12 - 'Supergirl' Supplemental Material

When WB actually re-released 'Supergirl' on DVD themselves in 2006, they included the international version with its audio commentary track as produced by Anchor Bay but didn't release any of the other supplemental features. We need the hour long 1984 TV documentary, a new retrospective (as opposed to five seconds mention on the 2006 boxset) and a look at writer David Odell's initial script which featured both Brainiac and the legendary Christopher Reeve cameo where he welcomes Supergirl to Earth.

Disc 13 - 'Superman IV: The Quest For Peace' Theatrical Cut

Oh the pain, the pain of it all!

Disc 14 - 'Superman IV: The Quest For Peace' Extended Cut

This is quite a tricky topic because, after reading about the huge chunk of footage which was removed from the film, as well as being one of the few people on the planet to believe that 'Superman IV' is a better film than the third one, I was adamant that an extended cut should be produced. Then I saw the deleted footage and I realised that the material was cut most likely because it was so cheap and badly shot as to be un-releasable in the opinion of the studio. Then 'Film Score Monthly' released Alexander Courage's superb score, a piece of work that is so strong it actually elevates the quality of that horrible footage. I have finally resumed my opinion that cutting the deleted scenes back in and restoring Courage's score with a proper sound mix would, at the very least, make the film comprehensible. As the last performance of Christopher Reeve as Superman, I feel very strongly that the film should be repaired as best it can.

Disc 15 - 'Superman IV: The Quest For Peace' Supplemental Material

Featuring 'Memoirs Of A Nuclear Man: The Mark Pillow Story'.

Disc 16 - 'Superman Lives'

This is the big one. This is the disc film fans will spend two hundred dollars on an entire boxset just to own. I am talking about an all-encompassing, no-holds barred documentary detailing the entire development period of the 'Superman V' project and all its various incarnations. This would include the Salkinds planned fifth film in the series possibly spinning off from their 'Superboy' television series, the infamous 'Superman Reborn' which opened with Supes visiting a shrink and had his son being born through immaculate conception, Kevin Smith's 'Superman Lives', Tim Burton's 'Superman Lives' (something quite different), the Oliver Stone/William Wisher version, the planned seven film saga by unknown Alex Ford, 'Batman vs. Superman' directed by Wolfgang Peterson and 'Flyby' by JJ Abrams. As well as interviews with all the major players in the story, the documentary would show us the pre-viz sequences created by McG when he was attached to the project, screen tests of actors auditioning for the man of steel (including some punk called Brandon Routh), secret video diary footage of Jon Peters dancing around the production offices with a copy of National Geographic as shot by one of the lowly concept artists and the holy grail of test footage; the Nicholas Cage costume test.

Disc 17 - 'Superman Returns' Theatrical Cut

With audio commentary by Singer and with an isolated score track so people can appreciate just how amazing John Ottman's work on the film really is.

Disc 18 - 'Superman Returns ' Extended Cut

'Superman Returns' is clearly a three hour epic squeezed into a two and a half hour running time. An extended cut offers the opportunity to restore the much demanded 'return to Krypton' sequence, provide more meat to the otherwise rushed Smallville section and add the vital missing plot point that Luthor was responsible for setting up the idea that Superman's home world was still out there for him to find. When Luthor creates 'New Krypton' on Earth, the shots of its landscape are practically identical to the ones we see in that opening sequence. When Superman calls Luthor's plan "an old man's sick joke", that is what he is referring to. That wonderful subtext is lost without those moments being restored to the film.

Disc 19 - 'Superman Returns' Supplemental Material

No improvements necessary here as the documentary created for the initial release was fantastic. One cool addition would be a glimpse at whatever vague story ideas Singer had conjured up for his planned sequel before it got the axe.

Disc 20 - 'The Fortress Of Solitude Archive'

Finally, for the sake of completion, absurdity and the fact that twenty is such a lovely round figure, the final disc (inspired by the 'Zion Archive' disc from the Ultimate Matrix boxset) would contain all of the trailers, TV spots, concept art, storyboards, production and publicity photographs, concepts and released theatrical posters from the entire series. It would also be a fantastic opportunity to include material created by the fans themselves. Over the last few years, the Superman movies have inspired so many people to create their own artwork, posters and fan videos, some of them quite splendid. It would be a great way to generate interest in the boxset from fans, if nothing else, to offer them the chance to have their work included in on the DVD. It isn't without precedent either. The band Guyz-Nite created their own independently produced music video based on the 'Die Hard' trilogy. The video became such a success on Youtube that Fox included it as part of the 'Live Free Or Die Hard' DVD. The disc would also be a wonderful opportunity to digitally recreate the Fortress of Solitude for Superman fans at home. Imagine having the option on the disc to turn the menus off so the fortress can act as a TV/desktop screensaver, with the John Williams/John Ottman soothing you to sleep, right before a Marlon Brando a-like voice yells at you to pick a special feature.

So there you are. If you feel the urge to label me insane after reading some of these ideas then feel free to do so. The word 'dream' in the title of the series is meant to be taken literally. I have a pragmatic side like everyone else and know that there is slim hope that any of the above will come to be. I just know that come this Winter when I see Eric Stoltz as Matry McFly, I'll be reminding myself that anything is possible. I hope you will too.

If you have any suggestions for future title that you would like to see in this series then please email me or leave a comment below.

Special thanks to Jay/Mac for the boxset image.  You have great powers, my son.

Friday
Jul092010

Marveling At The Past - Fantastic Four (2005)

"Johnny it's dangerous for you to be out in public."

"You've been saying that for years."

I was having an interesting conversation with Jamie Williams the other week on the subject of how Thor's cape will look and move in his upcoming big screen debut. From the one photograph we have seen of the costume, the cape gives the appearance of almost hovering above Thor's shoulders with regal dramaticness and one thing suddenly occurred to me. Why can't Thor's cape be completely impractical and magical?

Why do seemingly all comic book movies feel the need to ground themselves in reality?

I suppose the positive response to Singer's X-Men and Nolan's Batman films have swung the pendulum in that particular direction and many, if not all, have benefited from that grounding. It is not something I am complaining about except to say that some comic book properties are inherently outlandish in concept and scope and by trying to remove those larger elements for film adaptation, you lose something in the translation; you lose the very essence of why that property works. Case in point - 'Fantastic Four'.

I find myself in a bit of a difficult position talking about this one again since I covered quite a lot of my problems with the film in my 'memo to the executives' piece but some are worth repeating. 'The Fantastic Four' is, by its very definition, grandiose. 'Spider-man' has always been the intimate life story of a boy becoming a man. 'X-Men' is an allegory for prejudice. 'Daredevil' is a gritty crime drama. 'The Fantastic Four' is a cosmic family comedy/action adventure about a team of heroes who, though based in the real life metropolis of New York, come face to face with super-powered dictators, alien invaders, beings from alternate dimensions, and mole people from under the Earth on a daily basis. I sympathise that this makes the comic a pretty tricky bugger to bring to the silver screen but if you don't make it on that cosmic scale, you don't have a Fantastic Four movie.

That is exactly what we have with the 2005 film. Thanks solely to the fact that the actors playing the fab four are doing their very best to make it work, coupled with some pretty good special effects, we have the elements to comprise half of a Fantastic Four movie. The other half, represented by the small scale of the film, complete lack of plot and its horrendously written villain, bring it down in quality to just above the likes of........well, its sequel, which got everything wrong.

'Fantastic Four' is also one of those films where I can pinpoint the moment where things go completely off the rails. The film's first action sequence where the F4 first use their powers in public to save a hundred or so people getting creamed on the Brooklyn Bridge effectively introduces our heroes to the world, setting them on the whirlwind career of press scrutiny, celebrity appearances and world problem solving. Then the film cuts straight to the Baxter Building where a huge crowd of adoring fans are already waiting to embrace them. A little later on we get a scene of Sue Storm opening fan mail from all over the world asking the team of heroes to come and solve all their problems despite the fact that, from the audience perspective, we have only seem them perform one heroic deed. In fact the next action sequence, if it can ever be called such, takes place well into the second act when Johnny Storm takes place in a dirt bike stunt show thing. Again, everyone in the crowd knows who he is. We are not even told about crimes they may have prevented or lives they may have saved that occurred off-screen. No comic book ever needed a montage more than this one.

The film version of the Fantastic Four never earn their fame and success and as such, it just does not work properly. It would be akin to watching a definitive movie on the career of 'The Beatles' and seeing the film go from their first live performance at 'The Cavern' in Liverpool and cutting straight to the release of 'Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band'. It just doesn't work. You have not been on the journey you should have taken with these characters.

To add insult to injury, there is no momentum to the film's second act. There is literally nothing happening and nothing is at stake. Reed Richards is scrambling to find a cure for the team's powers. Johnny is enjoying the celebrity lifestyle. Sue tries to get Reed's attention and affection. Ben Grimm just mopes around. Meanwhile, our villain, one of comics most beloved supervillains arrives at the Baxter Building, not to destroy our heroes or take over the world, but to feel jealous and bitter when he sees that Sue is back with Reed.

I do not need to remind you of just how important and revered Victor Von Doom is in the Marvel Universe. He is the archetypal super-villain. He is everything we think of when the term comes to mind. He is everything lesser villains aspire to be. He is monstrously powerful but always craves more. He has a rich backstory yet still retains a certain mystique. While other villains hide out in crummy warehouse lairs, Doom is the ruler of his own country. He has an undying vendetta against his enemy. He has a killer outfit. The filmmakers themselves say on the DVD supplementals that the character is the definitive inspiration for Darth Vader.

So why do we get the Doctor Doom as presented in the film? The initial angle of having Doom go on Richards' space mission was an interesting one. If the F4 are 'The Beatles' then Doom is the fifth one; the unrecognised, unloved character who is denied the glory and power of his team mates. I can accept that. I can take Doom as the millionaire sponsor of Richards' space expedition. I can take the love triangle between him, Reed and Sue. I can even take the idea of Doom growing organic metallic skin (though that gives me flashbacks to Christopher Eccleston in 'G.I.Joe'). What I cannot take is the idea of Doom as a suit; as a sly businessman. And I certainly cannot take scenes of that businessman being chided by members of his executive board who want to sell his company, which are direct lifts from 'Spider-man'. It seems not enough to rob Doctor Doom of his greatness. They need to steal crap from other Marvel movies to fill in the gaps.

There is the argument of course that Doom, as we all know and love him, is too silly to work on screen. A supervillain with armour, mask and cape is one thing. A supervillain who lives in a castle with robot servants is something else. I think the key to making Doom work is to make him the crux of the story. Showing the initial relationship between Reed and Victor as students in college as well as the subsequent accident which scars the latter's face is crucial to achieve this. Though some versions of the story have made that accident completely Doom's fault, the film should have placed the responsibility on Richards' shoulders. Regardless of the action and the effects, the first Fantastic Four film should have been a simple but relatable story about a smart man who makes one mistake and spends the rest of his life paying for it.

You have to wonder why Reed Richards is so single minded and focused on his work. I have always felt that Doom is the reason why. Being the greatest scientific mind on Earth is something Richards feels the pressure of every day. He pushes himself to always succeed. Victor's accident, the one small failure in a lifetime of otherwise flawless creative genius, creates a domino effect and leads the world's deadliest supervillain on a collision course to destroy him and everything he loves. Doom is the opposite side of the same coin. He is equally single minded and driven by that one failure he cannot let go of, his own uncalcuable arrogance refusing to believe it can be anything but Richards' fault. But during the course of the film, only Reed learns to accept his own imperfections and embraces being part of a family while simply tumbles further into the abyss.

Of course the film we got is not about anything. 'Fantastic Four' believes that just telling the origin of the characters is sufficient to create a satisfying movie. I mentioned in particular during my 'memo' piece, but it bears repeating here, that I have always wanted to see a Marvel movie tackle, in a light and almost satirical way, the idea of superheroes being so good at their job that they do actually eliminate the need for any other stable form of law enforcement or emergency services. I would have loved to have seen a story where the F4 wipe crime, death and destruction clean away from New York, regardless of the toil it puts on their personal lives, only to leave it completely vulnerable to an enemy who knows exactly how Richards thinks and how to deal with him.

Perhaps with the series being rebooted, I can finally see that film. I cannot see how you can make a worse film. All Fox needs to do is put one good idea in there, as opposed to none. Join us next week though for the big one folks; the one we have been building up to, the one which had too many ideas and not enough room for any of them. It is time to discuss 'X-Men: The Last Stand'.

Tuesday
Jul062010

A 'Star Wars' Reboot - Just Consider It For A Minute

So I'm reading Total Film today and come across a feature about a 'Star Wars' reboot.  I don't click on it because I think this is some news exclusive that I missed (I'm gullible sometimes but not that much).  I just look at it out of curiosity expecting nothing more than a bit of pointless fan fiction fun.

But after finishing their article, I have to say that they've actually got me thinking a reboot of the entire 'Star Wars' saga on film, wiping the slate clean, could actually be an extremely exciting prospect with the right talent behind it. 

Think about it this way.  There are some people who perfectly enjoy the six films series for what it is, regardless of its flaws.  There are people who pretend the prequel trilogy doesn't exist and wait patiently for the original versions of Episodes IV,V & VI to be released on Blu-Ray.  And there are people who feel that the prequels, with all the glaring continuity errors they bring into the later episodes, have forever tainted the entire saga.  Personally, all I will say is that people can tell me 'Star Wars' is still popular but if the prequels had worked, it would still be a yearly multi-billion dollar industry.  I hate to say it but that sounds like something Mr Lucas may like to see again in his lifetime.

Of course it is unlikely but all I am saying is not to eliminate the possibility that, say in ten years time, once George is out of ideas for television series, home media formats to double dip on, has tinkered with the films to the point that even he is bored and has converted them to 3D, he may be open to starting the series from scratch with a fresh batch of talent let loose and working from his basic mythology with the appropriate reverence.

Regardless of whether it happens or not, my mind is spinning about it.  When 'Star Wars' works, there is nothing cooler on Earth.  When 'Star Wars' is popular, there is nothing that can equal it.  If a reboot was good enough to repair the damage done by the prequels, tell the complete story that the fans expected the last time out and actually make us fall back in love with the thing, it will be so glorious that I will well up with tears.  Do you remember back to your first reaction to the 'Phantom Menace' trailer?  Don't you wish you could feel that way again about 'Star Wars'?

In any case, hop over to Total Film's article here and see what you think.

Thursday
Jul012010

Marveling At The Past - Elektra (2005)

“I got nothing”

That isn’t a quote from the film.  I mean I literally have nothing to say.  ‘Elektra’ is a film so dull, so pointless, and so unnecessary that I cannot even find a single memorable line of dialogue with which to start my article.

Part of the objective in this series is to partially reconceptualize the Marvel movies, to repair their flaws and dream about something better.  Just in that regard, ‘Elektra’ is at a disadvantage for me.  I cannot pitch a better version of the film because it never should have been made in the first place.  The only reason it was filmed was due to a contract between Marvel and 20th Century Fox which stipulated that if a Daredevil movie was made, the studio would also be obligated to produce an Elektra film as well.  Jennifer Garner knew it would be a bad film going into the project.  It is the only Marvel movie that producer Avi Arad has admitted as a mistake which never should have happened.  The film was literally made in about six months with a minimal budget.  And for the hardcore fans that would be responsible for making the money back, the character on screen was not the Elektra they knew.

If you cast your minds back to my piece on ‘Daredevil’ you will remember that I had a lot of problems with the way the Elektra saga was handled and even though the film was true to some of the basic story beats, it missed the point of what makes the character and her relationship to Matt Murdock work so well.

Where as their love was all too brief in the film, Daredevil and Elektra’s relationship in the comics was one that twisted and mutated into vengeance, anger and betrayal over the span of decades.  After the death of her father, Elektra pushes herself away from everything good that is left in her life to pursue an existence of soul destroying violence and when she finally comes back into Matt Murdock’s life all those years later, it is as something he barely recognizes.  Having only read the comics after seeing the film I expected they would eventually reconcile.  I expected Murdock to break through Elektra’s steely exterior and find the humanity and the love still buried inside.  It never happens.  The most intimate moment they share is when Matt cradles Elektra on the front porch of his house, right before she bleeds to death. 

Even more refreshing is an issue of the comics where Murdock wakes up in a cold sweat insistent that Elektra is alive.  We expect he is right because a) popular characters never stay dead for long, b) Marvel are notorious for it, c) Murdock has those finely tuned super-senses and d) as readers we are still in shock and denial that she has been killed.  The story culminates in Murdock having to dig up Elektra’s coffin to reconcile the truth.  Rather than the traditional empty coffin cliffhanger we would expect, he finds her cold, lifeless body just as he left it in the morgue a little while before.  Murdock breaks down and the reader is sent a very clear message; she is not coming back.

This is entirely appropriate to the story.  The harsh truth is that Elektra was a villain, in the broadest sense.  She had little to no consideration for the lives she destroyed.  She blocked out the people who tried to bring her back to the light.  She becomes the Kingpin of crime’s top assassin.  Right before her death she had accepted a contract to take out Murdock’s best friend and partner Foggy Nelson.  She paid the appropriate consequences of a violent, remorseless life.

To turn around after all of that and bring Elektra back from the dead just never worked for me, regardless of the fact that it was her creator Frank Miller who was responsible.  Elektra is probably the prime example of a pet peeve I have with a lot of comic book characters.  If that superhero is popular they will eventually have to endure a storyline which attempts to kill them off dramatically.  99% of the time they will rise from the dead and go back to business right afterwards as if nothing happened.  What has changed for me as a reader/viewer is that I can no longer invest myself in that character’s mortality.  Never again will I worry that they won’t be able to win the day or recover from critical injury.  Because, in Elektra’s case, there will always be some ninjas just off-screen to sprinkle some magic pixie dust and bring them back to life.

Elektra is still an intoxicating character and any excuse to watch her fight a room full of evil ninjas is what I call good entertainment.  Just don’t expect me to become emotionally wrapped up in it.  That is the problem facing the film.  The other is that the movie cannot even fulfill the simple request of being a cool, brainless action movie.  Maybe if you’ve seen the recent film ‘Ninja Assassin’ you would call that a good thing.  In the case of ‘Elektra’, what director Rob Bowman makes of the film goes completely against the source material. 

When the character was brought back to life, Marvel at least had the sense to admit the implausibility of it and take her into a far more fantastical world of supernatural forces and magic powers.  Rather than slicing through regular New York hoods, Elektra faces off against a ninja army who dissolve when they are felled.  Rather than a gritty crime thriller, Elektra’s story became a wild, ethereal tale about ghosts returning to the land of the living to resume an epic conflict between good and evil which has raged for centuries.  It’s larger than life.  It’s perfect for an action film.

So why do the filmmakers feel the need to pollute to make the movie about Elektra protecting a teenager?  If I were to pinpoint the moment we all collectively decided not to see the film, it would be when we first watched the trailer and realized that is what the movie was going to be about.  Elektra, famed as the sexiest, most savage and untamable character in the Marvel universe, is reduced to the role of babysitter with sais.

The film’s blatant attempts to use the relationship between Elektra and this kid in order to humanize and pacify the former come across as cliché and forced.  The flashbacks to Elektra’s childhood, almost bringing back painful memories of Ang Lee’s ‘Hulk’, feel pompous and pointless.  Though it wants to take the character on a journey of redemption, the film never has the courage to show Elektra in any sort of vicious or malicious light beforehand.  The only target we see her assassinate is some unnamed evil crime boss/businessman (poor old Jason Isaacs who surely has better places to be).  As such there is no journey to take.  There is nothing to redeem.  The Elektra we meet at the start of the film, apart from being completely different to the one I admired from the Daredevil movie, has OCD and a grumpy disposition.  That is what she comes back from.

The struggle to get there is non-existent too because ‘The Hand’, that supernatural and relentless ninja army from the comics, are presented on screen as such bland villains it defies description.  Cary Tagawa plays evil scowling Asian for the billionth time.  Beloved comic villains like Typhoid Mary are reduced to five minute special effect walk-ons.  The character of Kirigi, a huge masked and mysterious, unstoppable and invincible force of nature in the comics is portrayed on screen as an empty space without an inch of menace, intrigue or charisma.

The whole film is an empty space.  Usually even flawed comic book movies (like ‘Daredevil’) have something to recommend them because they are made by people who genuinely love the source material and have at least a basic understanding of why it works.  ‘Elektra’ is a film made out of some stupid contractual obligation by people who neither understand nor care to know what made it successful.  It is not honest enough to recognize what type of film it should be or story it should tell.  It presents a hero we cannot root for, villains we cannot despise and a plot so hackneyed I can’t even synopsize it.

And I have spent far too much of your valuable time discussing it.

Friday
Jun252010

Marveling At The Past - Blade Trinity (2004)

“The truth is, it started with Blade, and it ended with him.  The rest of us were just along for the ride.”

I find the opening line of ‘Blade Trinity’ extremely ironic.  In reality, the film begins and ends with Ryan Reynolds and it is Blade is along for the ride, reduced to being a guest star in his own film.  While most threequels suffer from a simple deterioration in quality after their second outing, ‘Blade Trinity’ goes for broke and ticks every single box on the checklist for how to completely destroy a promising franchise.

The formula is tired.  The main character has stopped being interesting.  Beloved characters like Whistler are dispatched in an insultingly cheap way.  New characters are barely introduced and then killed off.  The lead actor looks completely bored.  The tone of the piece has descended into comedic camp.  The villains are complete buffoons.  The film repeats beats from the previous two.  There is no theme.  There is barely a plot.  And all of it is wrapped in a foul smelling cloak of droaning techno music.

I think the main reason that most threequels in a science fiction/fantasy context are doomed to failure, regardless of the specific mistakes that may be made in regard to character and story, is that the concept is out of gas by that time.  Even if ‘Spider-man 3’ hadn’t completely butchered the black costume/Venom storyline, we had already seen every permutation of his superpowers.  There was nothing left to show us.

The character of Blade enters his third film in an even worse position than that.  Where as Spider-man at least has a journey to venture on, lessons to learn, characters to fall in love with, and great villains to conquer, Blade has nowhere to go.  Blade is not a beloved A-tier Marvel character with a definitive comic book storyline waiting to be adapted.  There is no cliffhanger ending from ‘Blade II’ that the audience is waiting to see conclude.  The character is deliberately written as one-dimensional and his only appeal to the viewer is that he is incredibly cool. 

We watch the Blade movies for the pure entertainment and escapism of seeing Wesley Snipes, in the role that he was born to play, doing battle with vampires through a dizzying combination of martial arts and inventive gadgets.  Because Snipes oozes such energy, devotion and fun to the part, the audience cannot help but have a great time too.  ‘Blade Trinity’ robs us of even that.  At this point we have seen every conceivable way that you can kill a vampire and by the time the one billionth baddie disintegrates into ash in the climax, you are just about ready to tear your eyes out.    Snipes himself looks equally bored.

And who can blame him?  ‘Blade Trinity’ commits the worst sin of all in actually forgetting what its own title is.  It can seriously hurt a movie when the lead actor looks bored to be there.  But when the writer/director stops caring about the main character, how can the audience?  The film becomes an instant and irredeemable failure.  The takeover of the piece by Jessica Biel and Ryan Reynolds starts subtly enough but you soon realize that, despite the fact he is the only entertaining thing on screen, the character of Hannibal King is delivering so many zingers per minute, it is actually undermining Blade, who is relegated to providing deadpan stares of disgust and disapproval.  Blade becomes the straight man in a buddy comedy.  At least Blade is on screen during those scenes.  In the third act, King is captured by the villains and chained up in front of Park Posey’s head vampire for what amounts to practically a stand-up comedy act as Reynolds unloads comic insults by the bucket-load.  In a perfect example of the film’s tonal inconsistency, we cut back and forth between this farce and Jessica Biel’s character cradling the dead body of her friend, taking an emotional shower and training for the final battle.  Meanwhile, the audience is left to casually glance at their movie ticket which they could have sworn said ‘Blade’ on it.

To add insult to injury, the other Nightstalker characters are among the most lazily written I’ve ever seen, which is saying something given that practically all of them only get one proper scene of dialogue before being killed off.  Patton Oswald is stereotypically cast as the nerdy tech guy and is far too talented to be wasting his time here.  The ‘black guy’ makes his entrance in a car playing loud rap music and has such limited personality that he makes Common’s role in ‘Terminator Salvation’ look richly layered.  Natasha Lyonne plays the resident scientist of the team, who is blind solely for the reason that some filmmakers find it necessary to inflict some physical handicap on those types of characters to emphasize the triumph of mind over body.  Even worse, her character is, after what is supposed to be an emotional death scene, revealed to be utterly pointless to the story as our heroes are introduced to another random Russian/European tech guy who is able to finish her work on the vampire killing virus she was working on, before vanishing from the film not two minutes after we meet him.  Finally, Lyonne’s character has a daughter who is also kidnapped for the climax but has zero bearing on the plot, to the extent that the film itself realizes this and does not even give her a proper exit. 

We can only be marginally upset with characters that have no impact on the story.  Where ‘Blade Trinity’ really marks the end of the series is in its portrayal of the vampires themselves.  If you remember my piece on the first film in the series you will know how much I loved the portrayal of Blade’s enemies as young, sexy and vicious predatory creatures of instinct who lived life for all its worth and didn’t let anyone stand in their way.  They were dangerous, smart, evil, and you could not wait for Blade to turn them to dust.  Even the villains in the second film were developed characters with personalities and motivations.  The villains of ‘Blade Trinity’ are cartoonish imbeciles without one shred of menace to them.  What would you expect when Parker Posey is cast as their leader?

This portrayal of modern vampires seems to be intentionally farcical as the crux of Dracula’s character is that he has become disgusted with how far his race has fallen from glory and that he would rather retreat into the shadows, curl up and die rather than be their savior.  It is an interesting angle and could have worked very well in the film were it not for the fact that Dominic Purcell is the most miscast actor to play Dracula in cinema history.  I would be tempted to call his the worst portrayal as well but he would have to duke it out with Richard Roxburgh’s turn in ‘Van Helsing’ for the trophy.

Absolutely everything that could go wrong with Dracula in ‘Blade Trinity’ does.  Rather than casting some unnatural looking European actor that immediately unsettles the audience, we get a beefy Australian who is not in the least bit frightening.  The appearance, presence and power of the character is built up rather effectively over the first act care of Ryan Reynolds’ exposition and we tingle with anticipation at the thought of the fireworks which will occur once the patriarch of vampires goes head to head with the Daywalker.  And what happens during that epic clash?  Dracula runs away, then faces Blade using a baby as a shield, and then runs away again.

Rather than building on the idea of a Dracula who is ashamed of what vampires have become and his reluctance to pull them out of the gutter, the film completely forgets the character feels that way after his introductory scene.  In fact the villains don’t have any kind of scheme to pull off except for killing Blade.  Dracula simply stands in the wings doing nothing until he decides to join in the hunt, again for no clear reason.  There is no antagonism.  There is nothing propelling the story forward.  There is no real threat for Blade to conquer.  And this isn’t some random villain we’re talking about.  The whole series has been building up to the appearance of Dracula and we get nothing out of it.

So I guess I didn’t like ‘Blade Trinity’ very much.  I could go on even longer but we’re out of space here.  It really has been stunning looking back on the film, seeing all of its deeply routed flaws at a basic screenplay level and realizing this is the sole product of David Goyer.  Goyer may not be the best writer in the world but the man has a definitive ability for adapting comic book properties.  He may not be able to claim total ownership of the Nolan Batman movies but a large part of constructing their brilliant storylines has to go to him.  With the Blade series, we are talking about something that Goyer not only adapted but practically created himself.  He set the tone, created the world of credible, modern vampires operating in plain sight, made us fall in love with its electrifying main character, and then he personally threw it all in the gutter.  I understand how it all went wrong but I will never understand why Goyer allowed it to happen.

Speaking of things I cannot understand, Elektra got her own spin-off movie.  Join me next week and I’ll tell you all about it.

Friday
Jun182010

Marveling At The Past - Spider-man 2 (2004)

“A guy named Otto Octavius winds up with eight limbs?  What are the odds?”

‘Spider-man 2’ remains, after 20 other films, the pinnacle of Marvel movies to date.  It was made by a unique and passionate filmmaker in Sam Raimi, who was born to bring this source material to the screen and now fully confident in his ability to bring the Spider-man comics of his childhood to life, not to mention the support and breathing room given by the studio to allow him to do so. 

The weaker elements of the first film have been attended to.  Where as the first often felt as if it were being filmed in Hollywood or on a back stage lot, the production design and cinematography of the sequel transports us seamlessly into Spidey’s world of New York and never lets us go.  Where as the Green Goblin wandered aimlessly through the first film looking for something to do, the second gives us a villain in Otto Octavius who has an understandable motivation and a goal to accomplish right through to the end of the picture. 

I love how the character falls into darkness because of advice that he gave to Peter but didn’t buy into himself.  Octavius, on the verge of the greatest energy breakthrough of all time, is too blinded by the success awaiting him at the finish line to realize that the experiment is doomed to fail and cost him everything.  And he is too arrogant to admit his failure when that happens.  Rather than working hard to rethink his fusion reactor from page one, he takes the easy option of stealing money so he can simply build a bigger one.  To quote the man himself, he is brilliant but lazy. 

As well as being a technical marvel due to an innovative combination of puppetry and computer animation which bring Doc Ock’s mechanical tentacles to life, the concept of the character allows the filmmakers to craft some of the most thrilling and kinetic action sequences ever filmed.  In my humble opinion, nothing before or since in any comic book movie has approached the awe of when Spidey and Ock go head to head in ‘Spider-man 2’. 

What I love most about the character is actually something that not everyone bought into.  In order to reconceptualize the character to have a redemptive arc, Octavius’s tentacles are presented in the film as artificial intelligence which take over his mind after the accident which fuses the mechanical arms to his body, also destroys his ability to control them.  In subsequent scenes, Octavius is shown to be actually debating his next move with the tentacles.  Rather than being ridiculous in execution, Alfred Molina completely sells the concept of this warped man.  What makes it click for me is that while the tentacles convince Doc Ock to push on with his obsession and become a criminal, the conversation they have is not too dissimilar from the things people say to themselves to get the same result.  If you want to really look at it from a psychological perspective, Ock is simply telling himself what he wants to hear.  The tentacles have nothing to do with it. 

The second film is epic without being overstuffed, containing the perfect amount of action, keeping its focus on Peter Parker and never forgetting it is a Spider-man film.  The story beats it tells, such as Harry unmasking Peter and MJ making the choice herself to be with him, are so well done they feel logical and inevitable, as if we could see no other way for the second Spider-man movie to be told.  It is also a film with something to say.  The theme of ‘Spider-man 2’ is very much about the gifts we have as individuals and the responsibilities we have to a higher cause to use them, even at the cost of our own selfish needs and desires. 

Finally, the film continues to recognize that, for all his web swinging and spinning, what truly makes Peter Parker a hero are the relatable hard choices he has to make as a human being.  More than any other Marvel movie, ‘Spider-man 2’ puts our hero through the ringer.  Peter must devote himself to fighting crime when he cannot even pay his own rent.  His only avenue of cash appears to be selling pictures of Spidey to the Daily Bugle knowing full well they will be used to further tarnish his public image.  He is trying to ensure a proper life for himself with a proper education but cannot find the time to study.  His love for MJ and decision to not be with her is driving him insane.  His best friend also happens to be the son of the supervillain he accidentally killed.  He risks losing even the love of Aunt May, the only truly dependable, stable element in his life by confessing his responsibility for Uncle Ben’s death.  Oh, and his superpowers stop working altogether.

But ‘Spider-man 2’ is not perfection.  Fan as I am, I flick back through those comics that Sam Raimi grew up on and, just like with the first film, sense a small but vital missed opportunity.

If you cast your mind back to my piece on the first Spider-man film then you’ll remember my long rant on the pointlessness of casting Kirsten Dunst in the role of Mary Jane as well as the redundancy of writing a character with that name yet endowing her with so many personality traits belonging to Peter’s first love Gwen Stacey.  If you’ve been keeping up with the series you’ll know that, in my preferred version of the films, MJ has not yet been introduced and Gwen has fulfilled the role of love interest.  The love story between her and Peter plays out much as it does in the finished product but with the addition of Gwen’s father, police captain George Stacey providing a human face to New York’s finest who have been charged with trying to bring the vigilante web slinger to justice.  The Thanksgiving dinner scene, in which Norman Osborn learns that Parker and Spider-man are one and the same, would have also subtly nodded that Captain Stacey has put the pieces together.

While I think adding Captain Stacey to the first film’s ensemble cast would have helped provide more focus on the city’s police and how they react to the appearance of Spider-man, the main reason you want to introduce him is to kill him off.  In one of Spider-man comics’ finest moments, Captain Stacey was killed while saving a child from falling debris caused by a furious battle on the rooftops above between Spidey and, none other than, Doctor Octopus.  With his last words, Stacey confesses to Spidey that he knows full well who is under that mask and charges Peter with protecting Gwen. 

So imagine our ‘Spider-man 2’.  Imagine Peter’s birthday party reintroducing both Gwen and George Stacey with the latter making subtle nods privately to Parker that he knows full well both how he feels about Gwen and what he really does with his “busy” life.  Imagine Harry Osborn trying to put pressure on Stacey to have the police begin a full scale manhunt for Spidey to avenge his father’s death with the police captain curtly refusing to do so, secretly protecting Peter.  Imagine Captain Stacey showing up at the scene of the Spidey vs. Doc Ock bank/rooftop fight in the middle of the film and being killed, just as he is in the comics.

Just adding that element provides even greater texture to the many story threads of the film.  Stacey’s death shows the agony of choice and fate which dominates Peter’s life as Spider-man in that he was forced to choose between saving his Aunt May or the good captain.  There is never a third option where he can save both and bask in his heroism.  Tragedy must always be endured.  Peter actually begins to believe what the Daily Bugle writes about him and questions whether being Spider-man is a liability to innocent people.  With Captain Stacey’s last words about protecting Gwen ringing in his ears, Peter is only further compelled to give up being Spider-man to honor those wishes. 

Gwen herself, obviously heartbroken over the death of her father, needs companionship more than ever.  She needs someone who will always be there to look out for her.  Peter knows this and desperately wants to be that person but Gwen has already found what she needs in astronaut John Jameson.  Peter is also torn in that he wants to lift the weight from his heart and confess his secret identity to Gwen but this is further complicated being that he will have to also confess his responsibility for her father’s death.  Before the end of the film, it is Gwen who will give Spider-man the strength to fight on by absolving him of that blame.  Also, by having Doc Ock be responsible for Captain Stacey’s death, a proper antagonism is established between the villain and Gwen.  As opposed to her being the bait for the hero, once again kidnapped but some nutcase she doesn’t know.

While the finished film does a good enough job convincing you of Peter’s decision to give up the costume, there was one element that never sat well with me.  For all his issues, I could never believe that Peter would give up being Spider-man if he knew that Doc Ock was still at large.  This is a force well beyond the power of a police force to stop.  If their initial fight at the bank could have established Ock as missing and presumed dead, Peter’s return to normality would have made perfect sense.

But I digress.  You can tell how much I admire the ‘Spider-man 2’ that we got.  It is everything we, as fans, ask for with these comic book movies.  It is a film made with love and passion, with a real story to tell, rather than just a checklist of studio/producer/actor notes of scenes they each want to see stuffed into the narrative.  Please do check back with me in a few weeks time for a very close, and most likely angry, look into the film which magically erased all the good work done to the Spider-man movies up to that point and destroyed a franchise.  But before we delve into ‘Spider-man 3’, join me next week for a look back at a film which fits the exact same description; ‘Blade Trinity’.

Friday
Jun112010

Marveling At The Past - The Punisher (2004)

“Go with God, Castle”

“God’s gonna sit this one out”

While some estimates at the time of the release of ‘The Punisher’ put its budget at about the $30 million mark, I remember later reading reports that it actually cost less than half that.  And I find it terrible hard to be overly critical to a film that cheap.

In fact I do find things to enjoy in the movie.  Thomas Jane looks the part and tries his best to make it work.  For what limited action it can afford, you can appreciate that director Jonathan Hensleigh actually lets you see what is happening in the sequences, as opposed to certain unmentionable blockbusters which cost twenty times as much to make.  I even think (gasp) there are a few well written dialogue scenes.  Yes, we all know that the film should have been set in New York, a city intrinsically connected to the character of Frank Castle, as opposed to the chosen low budget alternative of Tampa, Florida.  But that isn’t why the film fails to work as an adaptation of the character. 

When Garth Ennis wrote the definitive Punisher story ‘Welcome Back Frank” in 2000, which inspired Hensleigh’s film in the first place, the tone of the piece was crystallized.  ‘The Punisher’ is pulp entertainment.  It was never meant to be approached as high literature.  It is not the story of a man’s quest for redemption nor a psychological study of what makes a vigilante.  In Ennis’ hands, ‘The Punisher is a high energy, maximum violence page turner.  A hilarious, though mean spirited, mockery of the justice system and organized law in which a lone man, completely dehumanized by one tragic event, ventures on a ridiculously excessive and seemingly endless crusade to burn down every criminal that walks the Earth. 

The whole joke of the piece is that every issue of Frank Castle’s adventures is essentially the same.  In one comic, Castle will burst out of a coffin at a mob funeral and gun down so many people you would think New York would be crime free for the next decade, only for a fresh batch of hoods to turn up in the very next issue.  And Ennis makes it a point to tell us that Castle is fully aware that he is not creating a solution to crime, nor is he particularly standing up for the weak and innocent.  He does what he does because he enjoys it, having gone far beyond the point of simply avenging his family.

‘The Punisher’ is the story of a man who looses his marbles, plain and simple.  It is about a guy who kills because he is good at it, because it makes him feel better and because nobody is in his life to tell him to stop.  By the time Frank Castle has slayed his hundredth crime lord, you cannot even visualize the idea that this man had a family.  Given how clear this message is in the comics, I cannot understand why Hensleigh decided to turn the piece into a grim, humorless story about a tortured soul.

In the film, Castle seems fully intent on blowing his brains out as soon as his final target crime lord Howard Saint is dead.  The only thing that stops him is the memory of his wife and the image of her rejecting him in the afterlife because of what he has become.  It is so morbid and, dare I say mature.  And ‘The Punisher’ isn’t supposed to be mature.  It is supposed to be the best gratuitous 80’s action movie that wasn’t made in that decade.

I mean it seems Hensleigh even forgot the name of the film he was making.  It is called ‘The Punisher’.  Even if you weren’t familiar with the character you would assume that he does the punishing himself in a hands on manner.  In the film, just as in the Garth Ennis stories, Frank Castle must cut his way through a food chain of underworld hoods, killers and lowlifes, starting from the bottom and making his way up to the big boss.  But where as in the comics Castle personally picks off his targets one by one in a variety of creative and grisly ways, the film robs the character of that and as such, robs it of its faithfulness to the source material.

The film version of Frank Castle enacts revenge on Howard Saint by sabotaging his organization, framing his subordinates as corrupt through a series of elaborate set ups.  Eventually, Castle creates such a climate of mistrust for Saint that the villain kills his own people until only he remains, at which point, just before he himself gasps his final breath, is shown the way he was manipulated. 

All of which can be made into a compelling revenge thriller…….but it isn’t ‘The Punisher’.  The Frank Castle I know does not have the patience to, through elaborate use of a portable fire hydrant, set up both Saint’s wife and his right hand man as secret lovers so they can both be killed by the man himself.  Castle’s version of justice isn’t patient.  If he knows where you are, he is coming to kill you.

It sounds like I’m ripping the movie apart as if it violently and intentional veered from the source material.  Truth be told, one section of the film’s second act is ripped straight from the pages of ‘Welcome Back Frank’.  After each night of butchery, Castle returns to a shabby apartment block populated by fellow outcasts Joan the mouse, clinically obese Bumpo and the emaciated, pierced face Spacker Dave.  The film latches onto the absurdity of a vigilante living next door, armed to the teeth and how his fellow tenants can’t seem to put the pieces together of what he does for a living.

When the violence comes home in the form of hired killer ‘The Russian’, Castle is critically wounded forcing his fellow neighbors to take care of him.  And when Saint’s goons come looking for the Punisher, Spacker Dave shows his real metal is not plastered all over his face but in his resolve as he endures unspeakable torture for refusing to give up his friend.  Castle is dumbfounded that this weedy little guy who looks not too dissimilar to the bugs he squashes when he goes to work would be willing to die for him.

Another particular scene I am fond of is when the three characters invite Castle to dinner one evening and Joan makes them say what they are thankful for.  While the others list a long line of character defects and personal problems that they are thankful they are starting to overcome, Castle simply thanks Joan for dinner.  A moment like that tells you all you need to know about his perspective on life.

But the characters serve an important function in the story in that they show that Castle has not gone completely off the deep end in terms of his sanity.  For all that he has become, he still recognizes that there are good people in his city and they deserve not to be dragged into his world of violence.  As Castle moves on to new pastures at the end of the story, he leaves Joan, Bumpo and Dave a large bundle of Saint’s cash so that they can get the hell out of it.

This one has been a frustrating subject to tackle and I apologize if I sounded a little rambled this week.  It is difficult to criticize an adaptation of a high octane action character which didn’t have the necessary budget for an action picture.  It is hard to know whether more money would have improved the film.  It seems almost a certainty now that ‘The Punisher’ is not meant for the world of film.  In the wake of Hensleigh’s effort, the franchise was rebooted in 2008 with a film which thoroughly embraced the adrenaline fueled lunacy of the character and dispended with any notion of subtle character beats.

And it bombed and sucked to boot.  I guess you just can’t please this Punisher fan.  But we will get onto ‘Punisher: War Zone’ in a few weeks time.  Join me next week for a second swing at Spider-man.

Page 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 11 Next 10 Entries »