Tuesday
Sep222009

Archie Andrews Signs with CAA

Today's article is a fair bit different than most of the ones I've done lately.  Normally I report news on DC or Marvel comics, maybe Darkhorse, or give an opinion as to what I feel would make a good movie or series from one of the lesser known commodities each company offers.  So, the fact that today's article is all about Archie Comics may come as a surprise.

According to Variety, Archie Comics Publications has signed a deal with CAA.  The Archie brand has been around for seventy years, and their stable of characters include "Archie & friends", "Sabrina the Teenage Witch", "Josie and the Pussycats", and "Cosmo the Merry Martian", "Super Duck" and "Dotty and Ditto".

The agency will seek to create opportunities in both film and television for its newly acquired branded properties.  Talent agencies, as Variety points out, have been the catalyst for matching branded properties with the correct studios.  Just recently CAA has helped "Major Matt Mason" be set up as a starrign vehicle for Tom Hanks, and WME has set up Battleship to be directed by Pete Berg.

Hollywoods been gobbling up these branded properties lately like a Hungry Hungry Hippo. First Disney bought Marvel, then there was the restructuring WB did to create DC Entertainment, and now this pact with CAA and Archie.

While I'm a guy who enjoys his adult oriented and violent comick book movies, I look forward to this arrangement.  Archie has an interesting band of characters in its stable, and Hollywood could use some more quality family films aimed at a slightly younger audience.  Whether it be cartoons, a television series, or a movie, I'll be interested in checking it out.

And before anyone asks, yes I did read Archie when I was younger nor am I embarassed to admit it.  Especially since just like him, I grew up in a town called Riverdale.

Tuesday
Sep222009

Leaving Metropolis

One can bitch and complain all ya want about Bryan Singer going “Emo” with the Man of Steel for his “requel” Superman Returns or the recent “Columbine Kal-El” get-up passing off as a “suit” on Smallville. But love or hate them, we can all agree that we avoided one Helluva kryptonite bullet with two simple words: Superman Lives.

Back in the mid-90s, Warner Brothers re-teamed director Tim Burton and producer Jon Peters who had successfully launched the Batman film franchise with the 1989 Michael Keaton/Jack Nicholson film to do the same for the Last Son of Krypton. What resulted was one of the great “True Hollywood Stories” involving such epic debates as Peters’ desires for a non-suited, non-flying Supes, killer polar bears and giant spiders as told in vivid detail by one-time screenwriter on the project Kevin Smith here.

Using the same “thinking outside the box” mentality towards casting, Nicolas Cage (coming off his “Best Actor” Oscar win for Leaving Las Vegas and popular commercial fare like The Rock and Face/Off) signed on the dotted line to portray Superman and his alter ego Clark Kent. Of course, what worked for Burton’s Batman doesn’t automatically transcend to Superman in regards to casting eccentric character-actors as iconic superheroes.

Taking one look at test footage of Cage in a newly designed red-and-blue suit (to be shown off the 3rd Act of the film after the Man of Tomorrow is resurrected from the dead) in addition to the sky-rocketing budget, Warner Brothers ultimately pulled the plug on Lives ironically enough replacing it with Lethal Weapon 4 helmed by Superman (and 75% of Superman II) director Richard Donner for their Summer 1998 tentpoles.

For those wondering after all these years just what the Hell Cage might have looked as Superman are in luck. A Japanese Tim Burton fan-site (who had previously leaked designs of what would have been Brainiac) claim to have the only known photograph taken of the actor in a costume fitting/test as shown in their YouTube video presentation.

If this is in fact real, words…fail to do justice what I’m thinking. “Wow” comes to mind. “That’s fucked up” is another one. Probably the defining thought that pops up is “Yeah…we were better off with Smallville and Singer’s film after all.”

Monday
Sep212009

Mark Millar Tells True Lies

In Mark Millar's world a lie is never a lie. In his world you can say whatever you want and then erase it from existence and claim you never said it all. It doesn't matter if it is engraved in the databases of many major film websites across the internet universe. If you live in your own world that you created, anything is possible. It's a world where everybody hangs on your every word and pats you on the back with a "thumbs up" or a "smiley face" no matter how much smoke you blow up their asses. Welcome to Millar World.

In yet more non-news from our favorite publicity starved E-List celebrity, Mark Millar has again decided to chime in on the ups and downs of what is now Superman on film. You see, Mark Millar has it all figured out. If he talks about Superman, even if it is completely fabricated, he will get press. He still hasn't figured out that he has been getting enough press with "Kick-Ass" and "Wanted', along with their possible sequels. Nope, that isn't enough for "The Comic Book Writer Who Cried Wolf", he needs to bring up The Man of Steel to satisfy his cravings for attention.

1/ I don't think I said they couldn't afford me now. If I did I was joking because writing Superman would be a massive payday so if I said that I was obviously laughing at the time. It's possible though as I like being glib.

2/ Nobody has ever seen my Superman idea besides Matthew. We never pitched. I've never done a pitch in my life (it's demeaning) so all this stuff about people hating my Superman ideas, etc, is just bullsh*t. Nobody's seen it. I don't write or give ideas away for free and simply wouldn't. I mentioned a big epic idea to Empire in a Wanted interview which was a couple of lines long, but no story stuff at all. So the stuff about me pitching is nonsense. I don't and will never pitch. That's why I like working in comics.

Really Mark Millar? You didn't say that WB/DC "couldn't afford you"? For some reason I don't believe you. It could possibly be because I'm still waiting for the lost footage of Eminem in "Wanted".  I'm not sure if Mark Millar could be glib if a "very well known American action director" like the BRITISH Matthew Vaughn was guiding him. On top of that, apparently pitch meetings are below somebody of Mark Millar's and he's never done a pitch in his life? He never pitched Superman, they didn't hate it, that is bullshit and nonsense...

 “…for about fifteen minutes things were looking very sweet. I had a massive three-picture epic in mind, cribbed from notes I’ve been putting together for the last five years for a Superman comic-book revamp and the people I spoke to absolutely loved it. Everyone said this was very, very exciting, but…

Well, sadly, I’m a Marvel guy and we were surprised to find out that WB couldn’t hire me for a DC property. They were incredibly nice and superbly apologetic about it, but when they discussed the matter seriously DC explained just how associated I am with Marvel Comics at the moment and it’s against company policy to hire the competition. It’s absolutely nothing personal. I spoke to some friends at DC and they explained this has happened with a couple of big Marvel writers in the last couple of years and I absolutely respect that.

So first Mark Millar pitched some type of epic Superman film to DC, WB, or both. They liked it but couldn't hire him because he is a "Marvel Guy".  Didn't Ryan Reynolds just star in "Wolverine" as Deadpool? Wasn't he in one of those "Blade" films? He's playing Green Lantern right? I believe this is a very real scenario. Back to fantasy land for a moment, now Mark Millar never pitched Superman because it is demeaning to pitch films. I can't wait to create my own world.

The truth is that Mark Millar has been knocking at WB's door for years trying to get them to go forward with his Superman ideas and they've been swatting him away like a fly. I really dig what Mark Millar has done in his career, especially with Superman. "Superman: Red Son" is still one of the best Superman reads I've ever flipped through. The problem is, every time Mark Millar cries out for publicity by mentioning Superman I want to cancel my internet access. Let's face it Mark, you're not going be involved with whatever the next Superman film is. The sooner you accept that the safer it is for the rest of us to start reading articles again.

Monday
Sep212009

Sherlock Holmes Sequel Already In Development

Even with all the talk about how Avatar is so revolutionary you’ll shit your pants three times over, I’ve long thought that the Guy-Ritchie directed, Robert Downey Jr. starring Sherlock Holmes would ultimately kick its ass at the box-office this coming Christmas. And although the jury is still out, it appears that at the moment Warner Brothers feels the same as I do. That or they’re just really confident in what they’ve seen so far.

THR (via their Risky Biz Blog) reports that the studio is already at work on a sequel with all the key players (the afore mentioned Ritchie and Downey as well as Jude Law’s Watson) set to return. They’ve gone as far as commission Kieran and Michele Mulroney for screenwriting duties. You may remember them from such other roles as writing the (long dead) cinematic piece of ass known as Justice League: Mortal. Well, this certainly appears to be an upgrade for the Mulroneys.

Oh and remember those rumors from a couple of months back that Brad Pitt would appear in Holmes as his arch-nemesis Professor Moriarty? Now the trades are indicating that there are “talks” between the Inglorious Basterd and the producers for him to appear in the potential sequel. Hmmm, might he show up in the finished film as originally reported after all?

If he does, we shouldn’t be surprised at this point.

Monday
Sep212009

Cloudy With A Chance Of Box Office

Weekend Actuals: Sept. 18th - Sept. 20th

1 Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs $30,304,648
2 The Informant! $10,464,314
3 Tyler Perry's I Can Do Bad All By Myself $9,877,436
4 Love Happens $8,057,010
5 Jennifer's Body $6,868,397
6 9 $5,563,134
7 Inglourious Basterds $3,818,142
8 All About Steve $3,373,212
9 Sorority Row $2,499,758
10 The Final Destination $2,388,473

Monday
Sep212009

Is Sean Connery Returning for Indiana Jones 5?

Even though they can do damn-near anything they desire, there are some things that even Steven Spielberg and George Lucas can’t pull off. Case in point, they had written a brief part for Sean Connery’s Professor Henry Jones (Senior) in Indiana Jones & the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. But citing the enjoyment of his retired life, Connery opted out and his character was replaced by Dean Stanforth played by the great Jim Broadbent.

According to Ireland Online, the two Beards are once again attempting to get Connery back for Indiana Jones 5. Then again, they appeared to have resolved that issue. If you’ll remember, it’s plainly stated that his character had died off-screen. So if this is to be believed, would Henry be risen from the grave, appear in flashbacks (a bit odd considering I don’t recall the previous Indy films going that route) or just good old fashioned “I’m not really dead, Junior. I just faked it!”

Of course, Connery is the kind of guy who’s set in his ways. He wouldn’t come out of retirement for what would been a day’s worth of filming for Crystal Skull. What’s to think he’d make an exception this time out? It certainly wouldn’t be the money. God knows he doesn’t need it.

But I could see there being some morsel of truth to this (i.e. they’d really like to get Connery to return). That aside, I’m not buying this. Sounds like crap to me, folks.

Monday
Sep212009

Could Pirates 4 Be Headed Towards Its Watery Tomb?

Well shit, there goes the surest thing Disney had going for them.

Despite having talked up the project for about two years now (going as far as dressing up in character at two Disney-related functions), Johnny Depp’s participation in Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides is now in question. This seems rather odd considering it appeared his deal had been signed, sealed and delivered for awhile now.

That apparently is not the case according to Captain Jack Sparrow himself. As he explains to the Los Angeles Times, a “potential deal” is in the cards that will ultimately depend upon the quality of the screenplay (being written by Pirates creators Terry Russio and Ted Elliott). So what the Hell exactly caused Depp to pull a 180 at the 11th Hour?

Long story short, the Mouse showed long-time chairman Dick Cook the door this past Friday much to the shock of…well everyone. Cook himself had quiet the “nice-guy” reputation among executives in town (a rare feat in that) and was pals with Depp. Furthermore, he was said to be the lone figure at Disney back in 2002 during the filming of the first Pirates film to support Depp’s performance after others were campaigning to get him off upon viewing dailies.

Now does this mean that Depp is in fact walking from the franchise? At the moment, No. But it sounds like his “I want to see a good script before I 100% commit to this” remark will be his outing if he so chooses to call it a day.

And as we all know, if Johnny Depp doesn’t return as Captain Jack Sparrow, then a fourth Pirates installment doesn’t happen. It’s as simple as that. Or the Mouse will just do a direct-to-video sequel with Russell Brand as Sparrow’s third cousin or something.

Sunday
Sep202009

Movie Moan - Movie Gloat

By our very own Phil Gee's suggestion, the title to this week's Movie Moan refers to the recent box-office failure of Jennifer's Body. It's a film that Phil along with Ed and Jamie have long thought would tank in theaters. So there you have it.

In addition to chatting about Jamie's dislike of Megan Fox's "biting the hand that feeds you" mentality towards Michael Bay (regardless of his being a bastard) and the Transformers films, the guys have a few other topics to talk up. The recent revelation of "no current plans" for the next Superman movie (and Phil giving Jamie another excuse to bring up the Japanese Toyota Prius commercials), Johnny Depp being not-so-crazy about doing Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides now after the firing of Disney chairman Dick Cook, what to think of the Star Trek sequel potentially going for "modern-day issues" and more importantly what should its subtitle be and the fact that Indiana Jones 5 looks to be actually happening. *Sigh*

In between those topics come the random off-topic bullshit including Phil having to putting up with Gwyneth Paltrow, the 1970s Japanese Spider-Man television series, Peter Berg directing a film version of the board-game Battleship and of course James Woods. Wrapping up the podcast is Moanin' Bout a Movie. This week, its Jamie's turn and he picks Mike Nichols' Closer from 2004.

Movie Moan - Movie Gloat

Friday
Sep182009

"Valentine's Day" Teaser Trailer

Ok so you get a cast of - Julia Roberts, Anne Hathaway, Jessica Alba, Jessica Biel, Jennifer Garner, Bradley Cooper, Ashton Kutcher, Patrick Dempsey and Jamie Foxx - mix them in and what you get is a confectionary rom com filled with beautiful people in Hollywood romance situations, named after the most manipulative money grubbing holday of them all. Stir in and you find a light as a feather offering that is sure to do big business.

"Valetines Day" Opens on Febuary 12th 2010 and you can check the trailer out below.

 

Friday
Sep182009

Memo To The Executives: Spider-man 4

In spite of having a cold, it is time for yet another round of ‘memo to the executives’ where I try to pitch the best direction to take the film franchises of today, tomorrow and yesteryear…..

….and boy have I been dreading this one, but it has to be done.  I’ve been dreading it because, unlike X-Men where I’m still energised enough to think it can be saved, Spider-man 3 screwed up that series and left such a bad taste in my mouth, that just trying to discuss any hope for a fourth outing literally saps the energy from me.  Yet I cannot take the easy way out and pitch a reboot this time.  We are getting a Spider-man 4 whether we like it or not and I have to try and figure out what I would like to see that could excite me again.

Which in itself is such a hard task as the entire team is returning, and despite the fact that they have been hiring new, and very talented writers, and that Sam Raimi is still a great director, Tobey ‘I just don’t care anymore’ Maguire will be back, Kirsten ‘he should have a spider baby with MJ’ Dunst will be back, and I keep hearing these rumours that Uncle Ben will be back, as will Uncle Ben’s killer, and both Osborns will probably be haunting Peter Parker in large mirrors.

It has to stop; following the formula of the first two films to the letter would have made Spider-man 3 a poor film even if they hadn’t screwed up the symbiote saga so much.  I was so bored of seeing CGI Spidey swinging through the city to that goddamn theme music again and again.  They could have shaved 30 minutes minimum from the third film if they didn’t feel the need to bring back every single supporting character.  Spider-man 4 is going to have change a hell of a lot to convert the fans who have turned their backs on the series.

And I don’t think most of the changes would be that hard to implement.  Let’s start from the beginning.  Each of the three films has begun with an impressive title sequence quickly retelling the story of the previous film for the benefit of the two people in the audience who haven’t seen it.  The problem this time is that people don’t want to be reminded of Spider-man 3 or anything that happened in it.  The tone needs to be set from the start that changes have been made, in the right direction.  The film needs to start with a bang and not the “look how great my life is/oh shit these pizzas are gonna be late” kind of bang.  Spider-man 4 needs to start immediately after the logos with Spidey in an action sequence, in the grand tradition of James Bond.  There are so many villains in the Spidey Universe that are not interesting enough to carry a full motion picture by themselves.  What better way to use them, to almost instantly re-convert the disillusioned fans, and to get the general audience hooked and in sync with the film than to have them act as an opening sequence villain; Scorpion, Rhino, Mysterio, Chameleon, Shocker, Prowler, Hobgoblin, Vulture, the list is endless.

The scenes of Spidey swinging through New York need a drastic overhaul (or a new special effects crew at least).  If we are to get a kinetic rush as our hero does his thing, we need to at least partially believe that the character is actually interacting with the environment.  Parts of Spider-man 2 succeeded at that brilliantly, the train sequence in particular.  It would be so great if they could shoot real stuntmen swinging in blue screen and integrate them with live action plates of the city.  It doesn’t matter if Spidey isn’t doing as spectacular a jump or swing as he can when computer generated; the audience will actually feel a rush.

Get new theme music; I’m sick to death of Danny Elfman’s theme.  It isn’t that it’s not a good piece of music but it has been used in the series now to the point of overkill.  Getting a completely fresh composer and fresh theme will help tremendously to make the fourth film………erm, fresh.

Don’t bring back every single character.  Mary Jane and Aunt May can’t just vanish without a word but everyone else can leave without anyone missing them.  Though if Aunt May is going to be in the next one, make it count.  Integrate her into the plot, make her a driving force.  There is, of course, one major piece of character development left for her to go through and that is to discover that Peter is Spider-man.  There is one particular moment in J. Michael Straczynski’s comic run where Aunt May  comes into Peter’s room to find him collapsed on his bed, still wearing his costume which Marvel President Kevin Feige has sworn to put on the big screen in a future film.  I guess now is as good a time as any.

Remember how Spider-man 2 was about Spider-man no more?  Well the fourth film needs to be about Peter Parker no more.  I would like to see a story where Peter, desperate to atone for his actions in the third film, actually sacrifices one half of his double life in order to be Spider-man 24/7.  He is commitment to his responsibility.  He’s terrified of letting the city down again.  He has left school, he’s quit the Bugle, and say 80% of the time we see the character on screen, he’s in the suit.  He doesn’t sleep without it.  He barely sleeps at all and he has moved out of that shitty apartment and back in with Aunt May.  You get rid of that landlord and his dorky daughter and you integrate Aunt May into the story.  Surprise the audience and have her discover Peter is Spider-man early in the film.  Have her confess it to Peter about halfway through and have them deal with it together.  Just give her something to do.

MJ on the other hand, is hampered with the problem that I (and I assume you as well) cannot possibly fathom why she and Peter would still be in a relationship.  So answer that problem for all our sakes and separate them.  They still care for one another but Peter has committed himself to his Spider-man persona and MJ just does not fit in with that plan anymore.  They have reconciled, she will keep his secret and she will still protect him but no more than that.  A decision which will have tragic consequences.

I know it’s cliché to kill her off but, who are we kidding, it’s the death scene everybody wants and there is no reason that it can’t be done well.  Rather than have her kidnapped (AGAIN) and die at the hands of a loony villain like a Green Goblin, do something different, which brings us to our villain.

We have been told that Spider-man 4’s villain will have close ties to the city of New York and many have been wishfully thinking that this could mean the Kingpin.  Apart from the fact that this is not possible due to the character being retained by 20th Century Fox for the moment, I think that’s the right way to go.  Rather than giving us a lead villain with a funky suit and power, as isolated and on his own as Spidey, give us a bad guy with real power, real muscle (both literally and metaphorically), and an army at his command.  For once, make the odds against Spidey seem insurmountable.  For once (and this is really important) don’t feel the need to have a villain who has a close connection to Peter Parker and finds out his identity at the end of the film.  Don’t have a villain who is totally psychologically justified in his actions; give us an evil, ruthless shit.  Transfer the personality and status of Kingpin to another character.  Either create a brand new Kingpin of crime just for the film or use a character from the comics like Hammerhead, the mafia hood whose head contained a massive steel plate.

Imagine a villain who literally controls all crime in New York but is smart enough to personally regulate his operation so things don’t get out of his control.  His men are unswervingly loyal and he has portions of the police and state in collusion to ensure what crime there is, can go off without a hitch in return for whatever favours he can grant them.  Spider-man is potentially a huge problem to this otherwise immaculate operation as a do-gooder with no agenda other than to protect the people of the city and see justice done.  Our Kingpin will try to convert Spidey to his way of thinking of course.  After all, he can provide money, he can supply information on his competition, and he can buy off the press that criticise him such as the Daily Bugle.  Spidey won’t accept of course and thus our villain begins a smear campaign and brings the law down on our hero (a plot device which was thrown into the first film but seemed like an underbaked afterthought).  For one thing, much good as he has done, Spider-man has now been indirectly involved with the murders of both Norman Osborn and his son, something which could be easily twisted to make the public believe he is an unhinged sociopath (not to mention his activities whilst in the black costume - none of which will have been explained to the people or the police).

A premise such as this gives us the opportunity to see set pieces such as a massive city wide police pursuit of Spidey through the alleys and rooftops with every member of New York’s finest on his tail, an enemy he must evade but cannot fight.  After all, Spidey can dodge tentacles and sand but try evading guns and helicopters, lots of them.  Imagine Mary Jane being arrested for her association with Spider-man, interrogated by crooked cops, tortured by Hammerhead’s, and all through it showing her devotion to Peter and not giving them anything they want to know; a decision which naturally costs her life.  Such a final act might even endear her to the fans when all is said and done (though just like Rachael Dawes, they’ll really just be glad she’s dead).  Imagine after all this high action, spectacle and drama, at the end of the day Spidey comes home, drained and unable to fend for himself any longer, where his Aunt May is ready to protect him until he can regain is strength.

And since they already did a complete 180% reversal on Peter’s love life with MJ coming first and Gwen Stacy after her, I see no reason why Gwen shouldn’t become the Black Cat (queue reader groaning).  She may be one character too many for this story but since we are talking about a plot with a lot of underworld crime and where Peter is Spider-man all of the time, she makes a perfect fit; a woman that Spidey can be with and not give up his commitment to Uncle Ben. 

I would also love to see (though the positions would be reversed), my personal favourite moment in Spider-man comics brought to the screen.  Occurring on the last page of issue 122 where Norman Osborn’s Green Goblin pays the price for murdering Gwen Stacey by being killed himself, Mary Jane tells a distraught Peter how sorry she is about Gwen’s death and is verbally assaulted with Parker assuming that she doesn’t really give a damn and is too busy being her usual care free party girl self.  With tears in her eyes,  Mary Jane closes the door she was about to leave through and stays to be by Peter’s side, thus beginning the relationship that will define them both.  It would be great to see Gwen in that place at the end of Spider-man 4, standing over a distraught Peter who mourns Mary Jane’s death and being rebuked by him for faking that she cares.  As Peter yells, Gwen (who has been living her own double life as Black Cat) realises that he is Spider-man and, no matter how harsh his words, does not leave the room.  She stays, now a rock for Peter in both of the lives he leads.

So that is enough rambling for another week.  Hopefully you agree that at least one small idea in this piece has the potential to breath life into this horse which, if not already dead, really is on life support right now.  And the great thing is, this time next year we should know enough about the film to see if I guessed right about any of it.

Till then.............EXCELSIOR!